[AVM Module Issue]: Automation Account hybridRunbookWorkerGroups

[ppons1997]

Check for previous/existing GitHub issues

• I have checked for previous/existing GitHub issues

Issue Type?

Feature Request

Module Name

avm/res/automation/automation-account

(Optional) Module Version

0.17

Description

Hi,

This issue proposes the addition of a feature to integrate the automation account module with hybridRunbookWorkerGroups, enabling the execution of runbooks (automated scripts or workflows) on machines outside of Azure's cloud sandbox.

Please create for
Microsoft.Automation/automationAccounts/hybridRunbookWorkerGroups
Microsoft.Automation/automationAccounts/hybridRunbookWorkerGroups/hybridRunbookWorkers

This is the API which can be referenced:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/templates/microsoft.automation/automationaccounts/hybridrunbookworkergroups/hybridrunbookworkers?pivots=deployment-language-bicep

(Optional) Correlation Id

No response

[microsoft-github-policy-service]

Important

The "Needs: Triage 🔍" label must be removed once the triage process is complete!

Tip

For additional guidance on how to triage this issue/PR, see the BRM Issue Triage documentation.

[avm-team-linter]

@ppons1997, thanks for submitting this issue for the avm/res/automation/automation-account module!

Important

A member of the @Azure/avm-res-automation-automationaccount-module-owners-bicep team will review it soon!

[microsoft-github-policy-service]

Warning

Tagging the AVM Core Team (@Azure/avm-core-team-technical-bicep) due to a module owner or contributor having not responded to this issue within 3 business days. The AVM Core Team will attempt to contact the module owners/contributors directly.

Tip

• To prevent further actions to take effect, the "Status: Response Overdue 🚩" label must be removed, once this issue has been responded to.
• To avoid this rule being (re)triggered, the ""Needs: Triage 🔍" label must be removed as part of the triage process (when the issue is first responded to)!

[AlexanderSehr]

Great issue, thanks @ppons1997.
@gpacetti would you have the capacity to triage and potentially even implement this addition @gpacetti ? :)