Build a better prompt for general scientific writing

[j6k4m8]

Right now, the LLM will sometimes respond with a trailing "@user: i did it!" or whatever, sometimes it'll strip the newline, sometimes it'll dup the whole line... A more specific prompt, and more guidance might do the trick.

[wrongu]

I'll work on version 0.1 prompts, porting over what I already have in langchain

[j6k4m8]

Awesome — assign yourself here for tracking purposes?

[wrongu]

Wishlist of assistant functions (not all of these are feasible):

• bullets --> draft prose
• bullets or prose --> critique
• improve readability and engagement per paragraph
• improve transitions between paragraphs and sections
• check or suggest references
• CCC style improvements to 1 paragraph at a time
• CCC style improvements to abstract
• detect and fix parallelism violations
• split paragraphs that contain multiple main ideas
• various tools for "linking" paper with outline
  • extract outline from paper
  • critique outline
  • outline --> abstract
  • outline --> title
  • change outline -> propose changes in paper
• "review" the paper

[j6k4m8]

i imagine that some of these will be most easily done by having some sort of:

class agent
    can_answer(user_request):
        return llm("does this look like a request to convert bullets to prose?", context, user_request)
        
    do_edit(user_request):
        ...

[wrongu]

Yeah that would be cool but sounds like step 2 to me, where step 1 is to implement them in a way that works when triggered "manually"

[j6k4m8]

+1!

…

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 3:03 PM wrongu ***@***.***> wrote: Yeah that would be cool but sounds like step 2 to me, where step 1 is to implement them in a way that works when triggered "manually" — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFJKBY4S36FRHACXQZT7I3XMSJGVANCNFSM6AAAAAAY4UDZOE> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>