Skip to content

Conversation

@alexsnaps
Copy link
Member

I've kept the anchor unchanged

@alexsnaps alexsnaps requested a review from guicassolato June 11, 2024 16:31
- [Request attributes](#request-attributes)
- [Connection attributes](#connection-attributes)
- [Metadata and filter state attributes](#metadata-and-filter-state-attributes)
- [Metadata attribute](#metadata-and-filter-state-attributes)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- [Metadata attribute](#metadata-and-filter-state-attributes)
- [Metadata attribute](#metadata-attribute)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although arguably the metadata attribute (singular) gives you a collection of other (not so well-known) attributes and values (plural.) So I wouldn't mind calling this section Metadata attributes if you want.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've kept the anchor unchanged

As mentioned above, I had left the anchor unchanged, so that anything referencing that part wouldn't result in a broken link... So what do we do?

@alexsnaps alexsnaps added the RFC Request For Comments label Aug 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

RFC Request For Comments

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants