Upgrade mantis java version to JDK 17 #705
Replies: 7 comments 3 replies
-
|
hi @garryliu-stripe thanks for looking into this. I think the main components can be upgraded into jdk17+ safely except the mantis publish related modules and the mantis client (essentially any libraries that could be used by other applications which may still require jdk8 support). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
A few small updates on this end:
@andresgalindo-stripe Would love to hear that it at least all fires up in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
[update] |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@Andyz26 - the jdk 17 upgrade has been really stop-and-go, and we haven't pulled in upstream for a while. to speed up pulling fixes in, we are thinking of back porting to a branch, maybe a |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
yeah i am fine with that for now. Fyi we are planning a major refactor into
the scheduling and resource cluster integration in next few months so
cherry-picking individual changes might get trickier and moving back to
master branch on your side would be a better option long term still.
…On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 10:20 AM kmg-stripe ***@***.***> wrote:
@Andyz26 <https://github.com/Andyz26> - the jdk 17 upgrade has been
really stop-and-go, and we haven't pulled in upstream for a while. to speed
up pulling fixes in, we are thinking of back porting to a branch, maybe a
2.x branch. any concerns?
cc: @andresgalindo-stripe <https://github.com/andresgalindo-stripe>
@mcowgill-stripe <https://github.com/mcowgill-stripe>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#705 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AU5L2E3XBVSBIUBF4VXDPHT3Z6QUDAVCNFSM6AAAAABM6ZVD5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTIOBQGY3DQNY>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hey @Andyz26 - Sorry to keep pestering you, but we were planning to backport the cherry-picked changed in #805 to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
sorry about the late reply i've been on vacation. Yeah we've moved away
from the 3.x branch so feel free to backport changes there.
…On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 8:07 AM kmg-stripe ***@***.***> wrote:
Hey @Andyz26 <https://github.com/Andyz26> - Sorry to keep pestering you,
but we were planning to backport the cherry-picked changed in #805
<#805> to 3.x tomorrow 11/6. Let us
know if you have any concerns. Thanks!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#705 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AU5L2E643Q3F66GSBLWRILT33IODXAVCNFSM6AAAAABM6ZVD5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTIOBYGI3TKMY>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey all! (probably @Andyz26 and @sundargates). What do you guys think of upgrading JDK to 17? I found an old issue from March 2023 regarding this. There was a attempt by @Adithya2907 and the attempt builds.
If we agree on kicking off the upgrade, we(Stripe) are happy to help with compatibility tests.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions