Added 'getOwner()' in 'PetLevelUpEvent' to fix null owner, and 'getOldLevel()' to retrieve previous level.

[dmoreux]

No description provided.

[AlexandreChaussard]

Thanks for the PR. I'm confused by the changes though. The levelUp method is supposed to be a forward method, in the sense that it's only pushing the chain of leveling towards the next level. Why do you need to have the previous level as input then? In the instance, if you call levelUp, the current level becomes the previous level leaving spot for the level up, if that makes sense.

From my understanding, only PetLevelUpEvent constructor would "need" the owner to be provided, even though I would rather not add it as input but instead just check that the owner is not null before leveling up. At least that appears to me like a better practice, even though I'm not a dev so I'm not well qualified to judge this 👍

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR enhances the PetLevelUpEvent class by adding missing data fields to improve event handling capabilities. The changes address a null owner issue and provide access to the previous level information.

• Added owner and oldLevel fields to PetLevelUpEvent with corresponding getter methods
• Updated the event constructor to accept the new parameters
• Modified the level-up flow to pass the old level information and reordered operations for better data consistency

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File	Description
PetLevelUpEvent.java	Added owner and oldLevel fields with getters and updated constructor signature
PetStats.java	Reordered level-up operations to call levelUp() before updating current level
PetLevel.java	Updated levelUp() method to accept oldLevel parameter and pass it to the event

[Copilot]

[nitpick] The UUID import should be grouped with other Java standard library imports. Consider placing it after the existing imports or following the project's import ordering conventions.

Suggested change

import java.util.UUID;

[Copilot]

This constructor change introduces a breaking change to the public API. Existing code calling the old constructor will fail to compile. Consider providing both constructors for backward compatibility or implementing a builder pattern.