You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: faq.md
+2-2Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ Work began on CF in 2001 and [Version 1.0](http://cfconventions.org/Data/cf-conv
126
126
127
127
### How does CF relate to other conventions/specifications (especially COARDS and netCDF)?
128
128
129
-
CF is a convention built on top of the netCDF standard, and it generalizes and extends the netCDF [COARDS conventions](http://ferret.wrc.noaa.gov/noaa_coop/coop_cdf_profile.html). Whereas the netCDF specification is designed to be domain-agnostic, the CF conventions were developed specifically to target climatology and weather forecasting domains. Since then, the CF conventions have targeted earth science domains more broadly, and expanded from a focus on models to include observational data.
129
+
CF is a convention built on top of the netCDF standard, and it generalizes and extends the netCDF [COARDS conventions](https://ferret.pmel.noaa.gov/noaa_coop/coop_cdf_profile.html). Whereas the netCDF specification is designed to be domain-agnostic, the CF conventions were developed specifically to target climatology and weather forecasting domains. Since then, the CF conventions have targeted earth science domains more broadly, and expanded from a focus on models to include observational data.
130
130
131
131
The conventions of netCDF and COARDS are assumed and upheld by CF. Where COARDS is adequate, CF does not provide an alternative, while all of CF's extensions to COARDS are optional and provide new functionality.
132
132
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ A motivation for developing CF was the need for extra features not found in netC
142
142
143
143
Not entirely; because CF is a netCDF convention, it assumes the netCDF standard is being followed. And it relies on the UDUNITS system of specifying units (see <ahref="#udunits">CF and COARDS units</a> below). CF does not replicate the information from these other documents, so to adhere to CF you may need to become familiar with the other specifications as well, particularly the netCDF User's Guide.
144
144
145
-
The CF Conventions were originally based on the netCDF convention called the [COARDS conventions](http://ferret.wrc.noaa.gov/noaa_coop/coop_cdf_profile.html) (named for their sponsor, the Cooperative Ocean/Atmosphere Research Data Service), developed in 1995. While there may be a few things in that document that are not documented in CF, working with the CF conventions does not require previous understanding of COARDS.
145
+
The CF Conventions were originally based on the netCDF convention called the [COARDS conventions](https://ferret.pmel.noaa.gov/noaa_coop/coop_cdf_profile.html) (named for their sponsor, the Cooperative Ocean/Atmosphere Research Data Service), developed in 1995. While there may be a few things in that document that are not documented in CF, working with the CF conventions does not require previous understanding of COARDS.
146
146
147
147
Aside from those references, a CF principle is to be self-contained. So for example the CF Standard Names attempt to be as general and well-defined as possible, so the reader does not have to access outside sources to understand the terms.
0 commit comments