Skip to content

IRR object attributes #5

@DamianZaremba

Description

@DamianZaremba

This list is only referenced on 2 inet entries (it may also be submitted privately e.g. in the Google peering portal):

inetnum:        45.157.0.0 - 45.157.3.255
remarks:        Geofeed: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/civo/geofeed/master/civo-geofeed.csv

inetnum:        74.220.16.0 - 74.220.23.255
remarks:        Geofeed: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/civo/geofeed/master/civo-geofeed.csv

Note: RFC 9632 prefers using the geofeed attribute (as supported by RIPE), rather than remarks: geofeed.

I propose the existing inetnum & inet6num entries are updated with the geofeed attribute:

inet6num: 2a10:c880::/29
inetnum: 185.136.232.0 - 185.136.235.255
inetnum: 185.243.80.0 - 185.243.83.255
inetnum: 212.2.240.0 - 212.2.247.255
inetnum: 212.2.248.0 - 212.2.255.255
inetnum: 45.157.0.0 - 45.157.0.255
inetnum: 45.157.0.0 - 45.157.3.255
inetnum: 45.157.1.0 - 45.157.1.255
inetnum: 45.157.2.0 - 45.157.2.255
inetnum: 74.220.16.0 - 74.220.23.255
inetnum: 74.220.24.0 - 74.220.31.255
inetnum: 91.211.152.0 - 91.211.155.255

Note: the current remarks: geofeed entries should be removed per RFC 9632 (Any particular inetnum: object SHOULD have, at most, one geofeed reference, whether a remarks: or a proper geofeed: attribute when it is implemented.).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions