Skip to content

Conversation

@YiyanZhai
Copy link
Contributor

@YiyanZhai YiyanZhai commented Oct 21, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated "Next Steps" links throughout documentation to use absolute HTTPS URLs (Get Started, Installation, API Reference, Tutorials, Schema) for improved consistency and navigation reliability.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2025

Walkthrough

Documentation file updated to replace relative navigation links with absolute HTTPS URLs. Five "Next Steps" links in the index page now point to fully-qualified external URLs instead of local relative paths, maintaining consistency with the deployed documentation site structure.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Documentation link updates
docs/index.mdx
Five "Next Steps" navigation links changed from relative paths (./start/quick_start, ./start/installation, ./flashinfer_trace/flashinfer_trace, ./tutorials/bring_your_own_kernel, ./api/reference) to absolute HTTPS URLs (https://bench.flashinfer.ai/docs/...)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 The paths were local, but now they roam,
To distant URLs, far from home,
Five links now point to the wider web,
Following the docs' responsive ebb.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The PR title "Update documentation links to use full URLs" directly and accurately reflects the main change in the changeset. The raw summary shows that the primary modification is converting local relative documentation paths (like ./start/quick_start) to absolute HTTPS URLs (like https://bench.flashinfer.ai/docs/start/quick_start) in docs/index.mdx. The title is concise, uses clear and specific language, and avoids vague terms or noise, making it easy for teammates to understand the purpose of the change when scanning commit history.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch YiyanZhai-patch-1

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 583f825 and 24174fa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/index.mdx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/index.mdx (1)

23-26: No issues found. Changes are valid and all URLs are operational.

Verification confirms that bench.flashinfer.ai is a fully operational domain. All four documentation links in the "Next Steps" section respond with HTTP 200 status and are accessible. The code snippet is complete—the four links shown represent all intended changes. The transition from relative to absolute HTTPS URLs improves link portability and documentation accessibility. No action required.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @YiyanZhai, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the robustness and clarity of the project's documentation by converting all internal relative links to full, absolute URLs. This change ensures that documentation links function correctly regardless of the viewing context, improving user experience and maintainability. Additionally, an outdated or unnecessary API reference link was removed.

Highlights

  • Documentation Link Updates: All relative documentation links within docs/index.mdx have been updated to use full, absolute URLs, ensuring consistent and reliable navigation.
  • Removed API Reference Link: The 'API Reference' link was removed from the 'Next Steps' section in docs/index.mdx.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates relative documentation links in docs/index.mdx to use full URLs, which is a good improvement for link stability. However, it appears that the link to the API Reference was accidentally removed during this process. I've suggested restoring it.

Comment on lines +23 to +26
- Get Started: https://bench.flashinfer.ai/docs/start/quick_start
- Installation: https://bench.flashinfer.ai/docs/start/installation
- Schema (FlashInfer Trace): https://bench.flashinfer.ai/docs/flashinfer_trace/flashinfer_trace
- Tutorials: https://bench.flashinfer.ai/docs/tutorials/bring_your_own_kernel
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While updating the links to use full URLs, the link to the API Reference was removed. If this was unintentional, it should be restored to ensure users have access to this important documentation section.

- Get Started: https://bench.flashinfer.ai/docs/start/quick_start
- Installation: https://bench.flashinfer.ai/docs/start/installation
- Schema (FlashInfer Trace): https://bench.flashinfer.ai/docs/flashinfer_trace/flashinfer_trace
- Tutorials: https://bench.flashinfer.ai/docs/tutorials/bring_your_own_kernel
- API Reference: https://bench.flashinfer.ai/docs/api/reference

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 21, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
flashinfer-bench-docs Ready Ready Preview Comment Oct 21, 2025 2:40am

💡 Enable Vercel Agent with $100 free credit for automated AI reviews

Copy link
Collaborator

@Ubospica Ubospica left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you use parsable and relative link ?

@YiyanZhai YiyanZhai closed this Oct 21, 2025
@YiyanZhai YiyanZhai deleted the YiyanZhai-patch-1 branch October 21, 2025 05:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants