diff --git a/pr-analysis-16201.md b/pr-analysis-16201.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..95fbfd3ccbbf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pr-analysis-16201.md
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+# PR #16201: Workflow Design Impact Analysis
+
+## Affected Workflows
+- **lint-development**: This workflow is impacted because the PR modifies an existing lint implementation in `clippy_lints/src/write/empty_string.rs` (part of `clippy_lints/src/`) and updates UI tests in `tests/ui/` (listed in `relevant_files` for lint-development in `.exp/workflows.json`). The change fixes a bug in suggestion span calculation for the `println_empty_string` lint when a trailing comma follows the empty string argument.
+- **testing**: This workflow is affected due to direct updates to UI test files (`tests/ui/println_empty_string.rs`, `.fixed`, `.stderr`), which are core to verifying lint diagnostics and fixes. New test cases are added for edge cases like trailing commas, `eprintln!`, and nested contexts.
+
+## lint-development Analysis
+### Summary of design changes
+The PR enhances the `check` function in `empty_string.rs` by adding logic to extend the `format_args.span` if the next character is a comma (`forward_span.check_source_text(cx, |s| s.ends_with(','))`), using `SpanRangeExt` from `clippy_utils::source`. This ensures the diagnostic span includes the trailing comma, allowing the suggestion to correctly remove both the empty string and the comma, fixing a compilation error in the suggested code.
+
+This is a targeted improvement within the existing lint pass implementation (a `LateLintPass` checking `FormatArgs` in macros like `println!`). It leverages compiler spans and source text utilities but does not alter components, sequences, or flows in the workflow design. The scaffolding sequence (using `cargo dev new_lint` etc.) and integration sequence (registering passes and emitting diagnostics) remain unchanged. 
+
+**Potential benefits**: More accurate auto-fixes, reducing user friction and preventing invalid suggestions.
+**Implications**: Demonstrates the extensibility of lint implementations for handling syntax variations; may require similar checks in other lints using macro args.
+
+No Mermaid diagrams require updates, as the high-level design in `.exp/design-workflow-5-lint-development.md` is unaffected.
+
+## testing Analysis
+### Summary of design changes
+The PR expands the `println_empty_string` UI test suite by adding test cases for:
+- Trailing comma after empty string: `println!("",);`
+- Equivalent for `eprintln!`
+- Multi-line empty string literals followed by comma
+- These in nested contexts (e.g., match arms)
+
+Updates `.stderr` to reflect adjusted diagnostic spans and help messages, and `.fixed` to show correct removal (e.g., `println!();` without comma).
+
+This follows the standard UI testing process: when lint behavior changes, update input files and expected outputs to validate new diagnostics and fixes. It aligns with the UI Tests Sequence Diagram, where `compile-test` spawns `clippy-driver`, compares outputs, and (in dev) blesses updates.
+
+No changes to testing infrastructure, components, or sequences; just content refinement for better coverage.
+
+**Potential benefits**: Increased test robustness against syntax edge cases, catching regressions early.
+**Implications**: Highlights the importance of comprehensive UI tests for lint suggestions; manual updates here mimic `cargo bless` in practice.
+
+No Mermaid diagrams require updates, as the design in `.exp/design-workflow-4-testing.md` remains accurate.
\ No newline at end of file