BE-214: HashQL: Implement SSA repair pass for MIR

[indietyp]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

This PR adds SSA (Static Single Assignment) repair functionality to the MIR (Mid-level Intermediate Representation) pass system. The implementation ensures that variables are only assigned once, improving the compiler's ability to analyze and optimize code.

This stage is critical in steps that may violate SSA, such as inlining or control flow changes (cfg simplification).

🔍 What does this change?

• Adds a new SsaRepairPass that transforms MIR to ensure SSA form
• Implements helper methods for IdSlice<I, Option<T>> including remove, contains, lookup, and lookup_mut
• Adds InlineVec<T, N> type alias for small vector optimization
• Adds contains method to IteratedDominanceFrontier
• Implements From trait for Place and Constant to Operand
• Adds comprehensive test suite with snapshots for various SSA repair scenarios

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

• Comprehensive test suite with snapshot tests covering various SSA repair scenarios including:
  • Linear code paths
  • Diamond control flow
  • Loops and nested loops
  • Multiple variable violations
  • Irreducible control flow

[indietyp]

• BE-223: HashQL: Fix SSA repair to handle existing block parameters #8136
• BE-221: HashQL: Implement DBE (Dead Block Elimination) #8135
• BE-222: HashQL: Remove span from type environment #8134
• BE-201: HashQL: Implement CFG simplification pass #8133
• BE-220: HashQL: Refactor constant representation with specialized Int type for constant evaluation #8122
• BE-214: HashQL: Implement SSA repair pass for MIR #8093 👈 (View in Graphite)
• BE-218: HashQL: Implement MIR test builder #8092
• BE-217: HashQL: Add PlaceContext for tracking read/write semantics in MIR #8088
• BE-216: HashQL: Implement MIR transform infrastructure #8087
• BE-215: HashQL: Implement dominance frontier and iterated frontier algorithms #8082
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 89.43590% with 103 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 57.32%. Comparing base (4946ada) to head (d9c58eb).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/visit/mut.rs	30.76%	35 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/visit/ref.rs	39.62%	31 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...al/hashql/mir/src/pass/transform/ssa_repair/mod.rs	93.02%	12 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/body/place.rs	50.00%	8 Missing ⚠️
...c/graph/algorithms/dominators/iterated_frontier.rs	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/body/operand.rs	50.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/pretty/mod.rs	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8093      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.41%   57.32%   +0.90%     
==========================================
  Files        1159     1161       +2     
  Lines      107201   108137     +936     
  Branches     4884     4910      +26     
==========================================
+ Hits        60476    61987    +1511     
+ Misses      46018    45433     -585     
- Partials      707      717      +10     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.14% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.67% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	49.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.47% <80.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	76.76% <89.58%> (+25.86%)	⬆️
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Updated (UTC)
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Nov 29, 2025 4:51pm

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.844 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.598 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.524 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.128 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.331 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-38.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-79.547 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-63.300 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.251 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.444 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.936 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.130 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.287 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.564 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.927 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.16 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 154 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$85.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 364 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.133 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$54.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 161 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$491 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.14 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.438 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$91.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.284 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$83.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 452 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$286 \mathrm{ms} \pm 731 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.445 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.860 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.969 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.487 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 356 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.358 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.400 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.544 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.408 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.849 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 342 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.691 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.618 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$9.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 45.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.457 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$57.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 351 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.910 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 354 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$63.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.638 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$72.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.560 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$81.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$88.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 344 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.510 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$52.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$81.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.151 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$59.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 319 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$70.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 374 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.734 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$70.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.520 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$141 \mathrm{ms} \pm 638 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$136 \mathrm{ms} \pm 508 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.530 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$45.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-55.715 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$578 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.26 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.365 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph