You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For different extensions of ibex (like SIC solving, SIP, min-max optimization or integral-based constraints/objective, etc.), we need a more general structure than the current System.
A solution might be to create an abstract class Ctr for constraints, with definition of services like the default associated contractor and self-relaxation/restriction; and an abstract class Sys for systems, which would contain a Fnc object as objective (this interface already exists) and a set of Ctr constraints.
This way, many algorithms would have a wider scope.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
For different extensions of ibex (like SIC solving, SIP, min-max optimization or integral-based constraints/objective, etc.), we need a more general structure than the current
System.A solution might be to create an abstract class
Ctrfor constraints, with definition of services like the default associated contractor and self-relaxation/restriction; and an abstract classSysfor systems, which would contain aFncobject as objective (this interface already exists) and a set ofCtrconstraints.This way, many algorithms would have a wider scope.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions