Retiring wiki pages

[jasonkarns]

There are a few wiki pages that were extracted from the original readme. How many of these deserve to be added to the docs?

1. Lineman's Tests: explaining how to hack on and run the rspec suite on lineman itself
2. Sass: explaining the special enabling of sass (the enabled flag and ruby)
3. Test Frameworks: quick tutorial of configuring testem for various frameworks (jasmine/mocha/qunit)
4. Troubleshooting: which only had 1 item (the old too-many-open-files -- still a problem??)

Votes on which should be moved to the docs?

[searls]

I sort of forgot about them. Therefore +meh

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Jason Karns notifications@github.com
wrote:

There are a few wiki pages that were extracted from the original readme. How many of these deserve to be added to the docs?

1. Lineman's Tests: explaining how to hack on and run the rspec suite on lineman itself
2. Sass: explaining the special enabling of sass (the enabled flag and ruby)
3. Test Frameworks: quick tutorial of configuring testem for various frameworks (jasmine/mocha/qunit)
4. Troubleshooting: which only had 1 item (the old too-many-open-files -- still a problem??)

Votes on which should be moved to the docs?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#8

[jasonkarns]

Test Frameworks is the only one I think really ought to be promoted to the full docs site; considering its content was specifically requested by a couple people.

[searls]

👍

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Jason Karns notifications@github.com
wrote:

I'm thinking Test Frameworks is the only one I think really ought to be promoted to the full docs site; considering its content was specifically requested by a couple people.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#8 (comment)