-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Open
Description
You might have discussed this before, but I am not sure...
I would like to argue for expanding the "metrics" into two parts:
- the
physical dimensionorperformance dimension: that is what we measure. For example: carbon intensity of the electricity, gCO2e, bandwidth, time, water usage, ... - the
metric: that is how we look at that dimension. For example, for the carbon intensity, a yearly average is a differentmetricthan anhourly average. For bandwidth, the median and 95th percentile are different metrics too.
I think it is important to add this precision because even if two studies consider the same physical dimension they may reach different conclusions if they use different metrics.
Thoughts?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels