Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
To what end do you want this exactly? And in stead of sending this static 'extra' data with every change in every match, can you not use 'meta.source' to identify the feed the match came from and use that to obtain the data you need? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
It would allow me to avoid keeping local state, which inevitably goes out of sync. My concrete use case is:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
As I am working with Squore and other tools, I am trying very hard to avoid keeping too much local state, which is just very hard to keep up-to-date. Therefore, I really appreciate your design by which you resend all the match information and metadata with every point and other event.
Would it be hard to let me provide some extra per-match data in the
matchesfeed, i.e. a keyextrain the JSON struct that, if present, gets included by Squore in all its JSON output?and this would then mean that Squore publishes on MQTT:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions