Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
You're thinking of putting them into the item and state (and not in the object), correct? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
@OVAL-Community/oval-board-members
Back in 2013 there was a proposal for adding a few more attributes to the Windows 'user' test, including "full_name", "comment" and "password_age_days", OVALProject/Language#168 These were eventually added to 5.11.2 in 2016, but also in 5.11.2 the Windows 'user' test was deprecated, replaced by the 'user_sid' test. Unfortunately, these new attributes were not ported to the 'user_sid' test.
I should have ported these attributes in OVAL 5.12 when I ported the "user" and "group" attributes from the 'user' test to 'user_sid'.
I've been working implementing these attributes to correctly support the deprecated 'user' test, and the primary field we 'need' for some new content is the password_age_days.
I'm proposing that we add the 'full_name', 'comment', and 'password_age_days' attributes to the user_sid test for OVAL 6.0.1 and potentially back port this to OVAL 5.12.1.
I would add the rest of the attributes from the 'user' test to 'user_sid' but haven't had a lot of success getting valid data from the remainder of the fields from the API.
Thoughts?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions