Skip to content

Conversation

@nevrome
Copy link
Member

@nevrome nevrome commented Dec 2, 2025

As discussed in #107.

Moving the definition of the protocols from the website into the schema is useful here, but it also makes me wonder if we should do this for more information.

@TCLamnidis
Copy link
Member

From Meeting Dec 8th: We should check the company that uses the Carpenter 2013 baits, and maybe name it using that. This would be more consistent with the naming of the Twist and Arbor captures.

Copy link
Member

@stschiff stschiff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, not much to criticise here, except that we should think about the name. I have looked at the paper, and I think there is no commercial kit available for humans. Instead, they present this capture method (called WISC, for Whole-Genome In-Solution Capture) as a general method how to capture Ancient DNA from any living species' reference genomes, including non-humans in principle.

I don't know... I think Carpenter2013 is fine. If we wanted to not hard-code the name of the first author here, we could also say WISC2013. Or a mixture: WISC_Carpenter2013. I don't know. I think I may have a slight preference for WISC2013.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants