@@ -25,24 +25,23 @@ private variable
2525
2626There is a striking similarity between [[ displayed categories]] , enriched categories,
2727and actegories. All three of these concepts take the basic algebra of a category and
28- replace the hom * sets* with some other notion of morphism taken from some base category
28+ replace the hom * sets* with some other notion of morphism graded by some base category
2929$B$, and then equip those morphisms with an action of $B$.
3030
31- For a displayed category $\cE$, hom sets are replaced hom * families * indexed by
32- some category $B$. The action of $B$ is a bit hard to see initially, but
33- becomes painfully clear once you've gotten your hands dirty: it is given
34- by transport of hom families.
31+ For a displayed category $\cE \liesover \cB $, our $\cB$-graded morphisms
32+ are the displayed hom sets $\cE _ {u}(X', Y')$ over indexed over a $u : \cB(X,Y)$.
33+ The action of $\cB$ is a bit hard to see initially, but becomes painfully
34+ clear once you've gotten your hands dirty: it is given by transport of hom families.
3535
36- For an enriched category $\cC$, we replace hom sets with hom * objects* $\cC(X,Y) : \cV$ taken
37- from some [[ monoidal category]] $V$. The action of $V$ is a bit tricky
38- to see at first, but becomes clear when we consider generalized elements
39- $\cV(\Gamma, \cC(X,Y))$ of a hom object: it is given via precomposition with
40- a morphism $\cC(\Delta, \Gamma)$.
36+ For an enriched category $\cC$, our $\cV$-graded morphisms are generalized
37+ elements $\cV(\Gamma, \cC(X,Y))$ for $\Gamma : \cV$. Moreover, $\cV$ acts on
38+ graded morphisms $\cV(\Gamma, \cC(X,Y))$ via precomposition with a morphism
39+ $\cV(\Delta, \Gamma)$.
4140
4241Finally, for an actegory $\cC$ equipped with an action $\oslash : \cV \times \cC \to \cC$,
43- the appropriate notion of morphism is not a map $\cC(X,Y)$ in $\cC$, but rather a
44- sort of "$\cV$-generalized morphism" $\ cC(\Gamma \oslash X, Y)$ where $\Gamma : \cV$.
45- The action of $\cV$ on these morphisms is given by functoriality of $\oslash$.
42+ the appropriate notion of $V$-graded morphism is a sort of sort of "$\cV$-generalized morphism"
43+ $\ cC(\Gamma \oslash X, Y)$ where $\Gamma : \cV$. The action of $\cV$ on these morphisms is given
44+ by functoriality of $\oslash$ and precomposition .
4645
4746** Locally graded categories** simultaneously generalize these three related notions
4847by combining the indexing of a displayed category with a sort of "directed transport"
@@ -53,7 +52,7 @@ over a [[prebicategory]] $\cB$ consists of:
5352- A family of morphisms $\cC_1 : \cB_1(X,Y) \to \cC_0(X) \to \cC_0(Y) \to \set$ indexed
5453 by the 1-cells of $\cB$.
5554- Identity and composite morphisms indexed over the identity 1-cell and composites of 1-cells.
56- - An action $[ _ ] : \cB_2(u,v) \to \cC_1(v,X',Y') \to \cC_1(u,X',Y')$ of 2-cells of $\cB$
55+ - An action $[ - ] : \cB_2(u,v) \to \cC_1(v,X',Y') \to \cC_1(u,X',Y')$ of 2-cells of $\cB$
5756 on morphisms of $\cC$.
5857
5958``` agda
0 commit comments