Skip to content

Conversation

@TimOsahenru
Copy link
Contributor

Issue Link 🔗:

Issue: #533

Type of Change

  • Bug fix 🐞
  • New feature/page
  • Documentation update
  • Other

Description 📋

  • What: Provide an overview of the issue this PR addresses. Explain the context and background information.

  • Why: Describe why the changes are being made. Highlight key updates, new features, or bug fixes.

  • How: Explain how these changes will affect the project or end-users.

Checklist ✅

  • Followed the Code of Conduct and Contribution Guide
  • Ran pre-commit run --all
  • All tests pass locally
  • Added tests (if applicable)
  • Documentation updated (if applicable)

Additional Notes & Screenshots

Add any additional notes or comments that might be helpful for the reviewers.

@kjaymiller
Copy link
Contributor

Please explain your changes using the PR description template.

@kjaymiller
Copy link
Contributor

@TimOsahenru instead of adding the image to each of the blog posts... Why not apply the image once in the template.

This way if there is ever a change in the logo design we only need to change it in one place.

Copy link
Contributor

@kjaymiller kjaymiller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Check comments please

@TimOsahenru
Copy link
Contributor Author

@TimOsahenru instead of adding the image to each of the blog posts... Why not apply the image once in the template.

This way if there is ever a change in the logo design we only need to change it in one place.

Gotcha! Thanks

@TimOsahenru
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kjaymiller new changes have been committed. Please help review. Thanks

remote: https://rubygems.org/
specs:
activesupport (7.2.1.1)
activesupport (7.1.4.1)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems like a regression. I would consider updating your gems.

ffi (1.17.0-aarch64-linux-musl)
ffi (1.17.0-arm-linux-gnu)
ffi (1.17.0-arm-linux-musl)
ffi (1.17.0)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure why all of these are removed. This could be an issue with our builds.

jekyll-feed (~> 0.9)
jekyll-seo-tag (~> 2.1)
minitest (5.25.1)
mutex_m (0.2.0)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems like things were added.

arm64-darwin
x86-linux
x86-linux-gnu
x86-linux
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

duplicates that remove the gnu

lang: en
title: "DjangoCon US 2023"
date: 2023-10-20
featured_image: /assets/images/bpd_stacked.png
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to remove these since it hardcodes the default image?

lang: en
title: "Marlene Mhangami Recognized as Python Fellow for Q3 2023"
date: 2024-01-25
featured_image: /assets/images/bpd_stacked.png
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to remove these since it hardcodes the default image?

lang: en
title: "Black Python Devs x PyCon US"
date: 2024-03-13
featured_image: /assets/images/bpd_stacked.png
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to remove these since it hardcodes the default image?

author: Anotida Expected Msiiwa
lang: en
layout: post
featured_image: /assets/images/bpd_stacked.png
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to remove these since it hardcodes the default image?

date: 2024-08-15
lang: en
author: Jay Miller
featured_image: /assets/images/bpd_stacked.png
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to remove these since it hardcodes the default image?

date: 2024-08-16
author: Jay Miller
lang: en
featured_image: /assets/images/bpd_stacked.png
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to remove these since it hardcodes the default image?

@kjaymiller
Copy link
Contributor

Reminder please update the PR Description

@TimOsahenru
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello @kjaymiller I'm facing some challenges updating my activesupport to match the upstream's version. I've also attempted to use the upstream's Ruby version (3.3.5p100) but haven't been able to resolve it yet. I'll continue troubleshooting, but if I can't resolve this by the end of the week, I'll unassign myself from the task and offer guidance to whoever takes over, as well as issue #365

@TimOsahenru TimOsahenru deleted the add-image-to-articles-without-images branch October 24, 2024 22:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants