-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Add imageresolver.Config to initialize ImageResolvers
#43308
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Go Package Import DifferencesBaseline: 0092fb5
|
| MaxInitRetries: 5, | ||
| InitRetryDelay: 1 * time.Second, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could possibly be configured via config/env var, but this is already static in current state, so retaining that for now
ImageResolverConfigimageresolver.Config to initialize ImageResolvers
Static quality checks✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
|
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 0092fb5 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | -4.91 | [-7.72, -2.10] | 1 | Logs |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +1.51 | [+0.04, +2.98] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +1.34 | [+1.26, +1.42] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics | memory utilization | +0.35 | [+0.13, +0.57] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | docker_containers_memory | memory utilization | +0.35 | [+0.27, +0.43] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders | memory utilization | +0.22 | [+0.17, +0.27] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.08 | [-0.35, +0.50] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.05 | [-0.32, +0.42] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.12, +0.13] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.13, +0.14] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.09, +0.07] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.03 | [-0.41, +0.35] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.05 | [-0.10, -0.00] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.07 | [-0.12, -0.02] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative | memory utilization | -0.11 | [-0.26, +0.04] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.23 | [-0.28, -0.18] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter | memory utilization | -0.31 | [-0.54, -0.08] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics | memory utilization | -0.31 | [-0.46, -0.17] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_delta | memory utilization | -0.39 | [-0.60, -0.18] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -0.52 | [-0.57, -0.47] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_logs | memory utilization | -0.58 | [-0.67, -0.49] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_logs | memory utilization | -0.62 | [-0.68, -0.56] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory utilization | -0.81 | [-1.03, -0.60] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | -4.91 | [-7.72, -2.10] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | docker_containers_cpu | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_memory | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_memory | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | cpu_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
What does this PR do?
Adds a new
Configtype in a separateimageresolverpackage. The config should contain all necessary configurations to determine what type ofImageResolverimplementation should be used.There is no functionality/behavior change from this PR.
Motivation
NewImageResolver()now only requires theImageResolverConfig, which can be updated later if needed.imageresolverpackage -- Starting this so other ImageResolver specific code can be nested in here in a follow up PRDescribe how you validated your changes
Local E2E validation using
injector-devto ensure existing behavior is retainedAdditional Notes