Duplication action GA

[secretsoup]

GA that checks for phrases like windows defender and virus and then posts duplicates. Let me know if you want to add additional keywords, modify phrases or auto-tag it as a duplicate/auto-close.

[TheLovinator1]

See words

antivirus
AV triggers 

Trojan
malware
Virus 
viruses
VirusTotal

Microsoft Defender 
Windows 11 defender
Windows 11 Security 
windows defender
Windows Security

Bearfoos.A!ml
Contebrew.A!ml
HackTool:Win32
suschil!rfn
Trojan:Win32
Trojan:Win64/CoinMiner!MTB
Wacatac.B!ml 
Wacatac.H!ml

Older threads had words like this; should probably add some of those?

[DevilXD]

Hmmmmmm. I'd still like to prevent having issues like this filed in the first place, instead of closing already-made ones.

I came up with this yesterday, before your PR suggestion: 6913657

It's a little bit passive-aggressive, but it's kinda intentional, otherwise people would submit it anyway. What are your thoughts on it?

[TheLovinator1]

I vote for issue template, but I think yours is too long? People will just skip reading it

[secretsoup]

why not both? if someone skips over reading and making it, it'll force them with a comment?

…

On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 8:48 AM Joakim Hellsén ***@***.***> wrote: *TheLovinator1* left a comment (DevilXD/TwitchDropsMiner#752) <#752 (comment)> I vote for issue template, but I think yours is too long? People will just skip reading it — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#752 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEGOWNCXXWXVPJ2FOHSIU3D3ORVBLAVCNFSM6AAAAACEJ46GS6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTEMBWGE4TKNZTGI> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[DevilXD]

@TheLovinator1 The point is that you can't just skip over it, because the checkboxes at the end are marked as required, so they'd have to select all three options to proceed anyway. I'm assuming they're at least that smart enough to read what they're selecting, but maybe that's a wrong assumption.

@secretsoup Hmm. Both sounds interesting, but I kinda feel like this may trigger false-positives, especially if we'd to expand the words it looks for. Does this close the issue it replies to, or just comments under it? Does it re-check every further comment under the issue too?

[secretsoup]

It just adds a comment. It can auto-close it or tag it but I didn't know if that'd be too aggressive in case of an actual issue.

…

On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 12:04 PM DevilXD ***@***.***> wrote: *DevilXD* left a comment (DevilXD/TwitchDropsMiner#752) <#752 (comment)> @TheLovinator1 <https://github.com/TheLovinator1> The point is that you can't just skip over it, because the checkboxes at the end are marked as required, so they'd have to select all three options to proceed anyway. I'm assuming they're at least that smart enough to read what they're selecting, but maybe that's a wrong assumption. @secretsoup <https://github.com/secretsoup> Hmm. Both sounds interesting, but I kinda feel like this may trigger false-positives, especially if we'd to expand the words it looks for. Does this close the issue it replies to, or just comments under it? Does it re-check every further comment under the issue too? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#752 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEGOWND5NQITTIL7GVXNVW33OSL7PAVCNFSM6AAAAACEJ46GS6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTEMBXGAYDGNZZGQ> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[DevilXD]

Hmm. Just a comment should be benign enough, I guess.

[JourneyOver]

I'm assuming they're at least that smart enough to read what they're selecting, but maybe that's a wrong assumption.

I can tell you now that making the assumption that people are at least smart enough to read stuff they are selecting is not a good assumption to make, time and time again I have been proven wrong and that people will just click things without even reading said things.

[DevilXD]

I can merge it like this, but it'll only officially go live when the templates branch gets merged into master, which should be Soon™️. I need to think about improving on the "Blank issue" option, maybe by adding a general bug report template, or something along those lines.

EDIT: Deleted some offtopic comments below.