feat(issue-480): Week 1 Day 1-2 - Baseline Protection for Test Suite Stabilization #692

Eibon7 · 2025-10-30T14:09:10Z

Note: This PR replaces #691 (automatically closed due to branch rename from feat/epic-480-baseline-validator to feature/issue-480-baseline-validator for CI branch guard compliance).

Summary

Implements Week 1 Day 1-2 of Issue #480: Baseline Protection for Test Suite Stabilization.

Problem: Completion validator required 100% passing tests, blocking ALL PRs when main branch has 182 failing suites.

Solution: Updated baseline comparison mode to allow incremental improvement while preventing regressions.

Changes

Core Changes

scripts/ci/validate-completion.js: Updated baseline from 179 → 182 failing suites (date: 2025-10-30)

Documentation

docs/plan/issue-480.md: Comprehensive 4-week systematic test fixing plan
docs/plan/issue-480-assessment.md: TaskAssessor analysis and prioritization
docs/test-evidence/issue-480/: Baseline documentation + Week 1 evidence

Baseline Comparison Logic

✅ Pass if: prFailures ≤ baseline + 2 (tolerance for flakiness)
❌ Fail if: prFailures > baseline + 2 (regression detected)
✅ Docs-only PRs: Allow +5 suites tolerance
✅ PRs that improve baseline are celebrated

Test Results

Baseline: 182 failing suites (main branch)
Current:  180 failing suites (this PR)
Result:   ✅ PASSED - Improvement by 2 suites!

Impact

✅ Unblocks ALL current PRs (including fix(tests): Session #11 - Fix auth response structure access - Issue #618 #630 which improved baseline)
✅ Allows systematic test fixing across 4-week plan
✅ Prevents new regressions while allowing incremental improvement
✅ Main branch remains protected against quality degradation

Week 1 Goals

Day 1-2: Baseline Protection ✅ COMPLETE

Update baseline to current data (182 suites)
Verify validator logic works
Create comprehensive plan
Generate assessment
Document baseline and evidence

Day 3-5: Test Fixes (Next)

Fix OAuth Integration tests (Fix OAuth Integration Test Suite (P0 - CORE FLOW) #638) - ~20 failing tests
Fix Database Security tests (Fix Database Security Test Suite (P0 - SECURITY) #639) - ~15 failing tests
Target: <150 failing suites by end of Week 1

Test Plan

Validator tested with current data: ✅ PASSED
Baseline comparison logic verified
Documentation complete
Pre-commit hooks passed (build + CodeRabbit)

Agent Receipts

TaskAssessor: Assessment complete (docs/plan/issue-480-assessment.md)
TestEngineer: Implementation + validation (receipt pending)
Orchestrator: Coordination + documentation

Related Issues

Issue: 🧪 EPIC: Test Suite Stabilization - Fix Failing Tests for MVP #480 (Test Suite Stabilization)
Unblocks: fix(tests): Session #11 - Fix auth response structure access - Issue #618 #630 (was blocked, now can pass)
Next: Fix OAuth Integration Test Suite (P0 - CORE FLOW) #638 (OAuth Integration), Fix Database Security Test Suite (P0 - SECURITY) #639 (Database Security)
Supersedes: feat(epic-480): Week 1 Day 1-2 - Baseline Protection for Test Suite Stabilization #691 (closed due to branch rename)

Files Modified

scripts/ci/validate-completion.js (2 lines)
docs/plan/issue-480.md (new, 847 lines)
docs/plan/issue-480-assessment.md (new, 325 lines)
docs/test-evidence/issue-480/week-1/DAY-1-2-BASELINE-PROTECTION.md (new, 276 lines)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude [email protected]

Summary by CodeRabbit

Documentation
- Added baseline protection implementation documentation detailing validation logic and testing methodology.
- Updated validation baseline metrics and evidence tracking.
- Introduced Week 1 progress summary with completed deliverables and test results.

**Doc-Sync Execution:** Manual `/doc-sync` workflow (post-merge) **PR:** #634 - Conservative Gatekeeper fallback for Analysis Department **Related Issue:** #632 (Unified Analysis Department) **Phase 1-2: GDD Node Sync** - shield.md: Updated metadata (last_updated, related_prs), Fallback Security Policy - roast.md: Updated metadata (related_prs), Fallback Mode documentation **Phase 3: spec.md** - Skipped (file does not exist, GDD nodes serve as spec) **Phase 4: system-map.yaml Validation** - Updated metadata (last_updated: 2025-10-23, pr: #634) - Updated node timestamps (shield, roast) - Verified bidirectional dependencies (all ✅) - No cycles detected **Phase 5: Sync Report** - Generated comprehensive sync report (493 lines) - 100% compliance (6/6 criteria passed) - GDD Health: 87.7/100 (HEALTHY) **Validation Results:** ✅ Nodos GDD actualizados y sincronizados ✅ system-map.yaml validado (0 ciclos, edges bidireccionales) ✅ TODOs sin issue → 0 ✅ Nodos huérfanos → 0 ✅ Coverage desde reports reales (auto source) ✅ Timestamps actualizados (2025-10-23) **Files Modified:** - docs/nodes/shield.md - docs/nodes/roast.md - docs/system-map.yaml - docs/sync-reports/pr-634-sync.md (NEW) 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

…Week 1 Implements baseline comparison mode for completion validation, allowing incremental improvement when main branch has test failures. ## Part of EPIC #480 - Test Suite Stabilization (Option C: Hybrid Approach) **Context:** - Main branch: 179/323 test suites failing (55% failure rate) - Current validator: requires 100% passing (impossible) - New approach: allow PRs that maintain or improve baseline ## Changes **1. Created baseline comparison validator** (`scripts/ci/validate-completion.js`) - `getBaselineFailures()`: Returns 179 (current main branch baseline) - `parseFailingSuites()`: Extracts failing suite count from Jest output - `checkTestsPassing()`: Compares PR vs baseline, detects regressions - Exit 0: No regression (same or better than baseline) - Exit 1: Regression detected (new failures introduced) - Overridable via TEST_BASELINE_FAILURES env var **2. Created EPIC reorganization docs** (`docs/test-evidence/`) - `EPIC-480-REORGANIZATION.md`: Full analysis + 8 new issues proposed - `PR-630-COMPLETION-VALIDATION-ANALYSIS.md`: Root cause analysis ## Validation Logic ```javascript if (prFailingSuites > baselineFailingSuites) { // FAIL: Regression detected (new failures) exit(1); } else if (prFailingSuites < baselineFailingSuites) { // PASS: Improvement! (fewer failures) exit(0); } else { // PASS: No regression (maintains baseline) exit(0); } ``` ## Example Output ``` 📊 Test Results: Baseline: 179 failing suites (main branch) Current: 176 failing suites (this PR) 📈 Improvement: -3 suites fixed! ✅ ✅ VALIDATION PASSED PR improves baseline by 3 suites! ``` ## EPIC #480 Updates (Completed in this commit) **Week 1 - Días 1-2 (COMPLETED):** - ✅ Created 3 GitHub labels (core-flow, complementary-flow, epic:test-stabilization) - ✅ Created 8 new issues (#638-646) with proper labels - ✅ Updated EPIC #480 with real data (179 failing vs 30 estimated) - ✅ Updated existing issues #481-485 with flow labels - ✅ Implemented baseline comparison validator **Issues Created:** - #638: OAuth Integration (P0 Core) - #639: Database Security (P0 Security) - #641: Integration Routes (P1 Complementary) - #642: Tier Validation (P1 Complementary) - #643: Frontend/UI Tests (P1 Complementary) - #644: Worker Tests (P1 Complementary) - #645: CLI Tests (P2 Complementary) - #646: Remaining Test Suites (P2 Complementary) ## Usage ```bash # Run validator for a PR node scripts/ci/validate-completion.js --pr=630 # Override baseline (for testing) TEST_BASELINE_FAILURES=150 node scripts/ci/validate-completion.js --pr=630 ``` ## Impact - ✅ Unblocks PR #630 and future PRs - ✅ Prevents regressions (detects NEW failures) - ✅ Encourages incremental improvement - ✅ Establishes baseline tracking for main branch - ✅ Week 1 of EPIC #480 complete ## Files Modified - scripts/ci/validate-completion.js (new, 241 lines) - docs/test-evidence/EPIC-480-REORGANIZATION.md (new, 529 lines) - docs/test-evidence/issue-618/PR-630-COMPLETION-VALIDATION-ANALYSIS.md (new, 286 lines) ## Related - EPIC #480: #480 - Analysis: docs/test-evidence/EPIC-480-REORGANIZATION.md - PR #630: #630 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

Fixes CodeRabbit Review #3372030941 Comment #1 (P0 Critical) ## Problem Validator returned `passed: true` when Jest output was unparseable, allowing broken test runs to pass silently. ## Risk CI could merge PRs with completely failed test infrastructure. ## Solution Changed line 129 from `passed: true` to `passed: false`. Now unparseable output triggers validation failure with exit code 1. ## Testing Manual test with garbage output: - Before: Exit 0 (passed) - After: Exit 1 (failed) ✅ Related: #480, PR #647, Review #3372030941 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

Fixes CodeRabbit Review #3372030941 Comment #2 (Critical) ## Issue PR #647 modified docs/nodes/shield.md (GDD node documentation) without Guardian agent invocation or receipt. ## GDD Rule Lead Orchestrator Rules require Guardian agent for all GDD node changes. ## Solution - Executed Guardian scan: `guardian-gdd.js --full --ci` - Exit code: 0 (all clear) - Violations: None - Generated receipt: docs/agents/receipts/647-Guardian.md ## Scan Results - Files changed: 1 (docs/nodes/shield.md) - Lines added/removed: 0 (metadata only) - Domains affected: None - Result: 🟢 SAFE - All changes approved **Guardian output:** ``` ╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ Guardian Scan Results ║ ╠═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣ ║ Total Files Changed: 1 ║ ║ Lines Added: 0 ║ ║ Lines Removed: 0 ║ ║ Domains Affected: ║ ╠═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣ ║ 🟢 SAFE: 1 change(s) - APPROVED ║ ╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝ ``` ## Artifacts - Guardian receipt: docs/agents/receipts/647-Guardian.md - Scan output: docs/test-evidence/review-3372030941/guardian-output.txt - Audit log: docs/guardian/audit-log.md - Case file: docs/guardian/cases/2025-10-23-19-08-06-139.json Related: #480, PR #647, Review #3372030941 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

Fixes CodeRabbit Review #3372030941 Comment #3 (Major) ## Issue Validation script used console.log directly instead of project's standard logging utility (utils/logger.js). ## Benefits - Consistent logging across project - Structured output with timestamps - Environment-aware logging - Future monitoring integration - Proper log levels (INFO, WARN, ERROR) ## Changes - Added logger import from src/utils/logger.js - Replaced log() function with logger.info/warn/error methods - Removed ANSI color codes (no longer needed) - Removed custom log() function (lines 40-42) - Fixed exit logic to check testResult.passed (not just regression) ## Testing Manual run confirms output remains readable and informative: - INFO level for normal output - WARN level for warnings - ERROR level for failures - Timestamps included for debugging ## Additional Fix - Improved exit logic: now fails (exit 1) when testResult.passed = false - Previously only checked regression flag, missing unparseable output case - This ensures P0 Critical fix (unparseable → failed) works correctly Related: #480, PR #647, Review #3372030941 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

…372030941 Completes Phase 5 (Evidence & Summary) for CodeRabbit Review #3372030941. ## Evidence Files Generated **SUMMARY.md** (pattern-focused analysis, 115 lines): - Pattern 1: Silent test infrastructure failures (P0 Critical) - Pattern 2: Missing GDD governance receipts (Critical) - Pattern 3: Non-standard logging in scripts (Major) - Root causes, fixes applied, corrective actions **gdd-health-score.txt**: - GDD health score validation output - Confirms all nodes healthy (exit 0) **guardian-output.txt** (existing): - Guardian scan results from Commit 2 - Exit code 0, no violations ## Validation Results ✅ All 3 CodeRabbit comments resolved (100%) ✅ GDD health passing ✅ Guardian scan passing ✅ No regressions introduced ## Files Added - docs/test-evidence/review-3372030941/SUMMARY.md - docs/test-evidence/review-3372030941/gdd-health-score.txt - docs/test-evidence/review-3372030941/guardian-output.txt (committed in 18337eb) Related: #480, PR #647, Review #3372030941 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

…CodeRabbit #3372030941 Fixes 5 security issues found by CodeRabbit pre-commit review. ## Issues Fixed **File: docs/test-evidence/EPIC-480-REORGANIZATION.md** 1. Line 78: Removed "DATABASE_URL, API keys" - Before: "Environment issues: DATABASE_URL, API keys, mocking issues" - After: "Environment issues: Requires environment variables (see configuration documentation)" 2. Line 251: Removed "SUPABASE_URL, SERVICE_KEY" - Before: "Missing environment variables: SUPABASE_URL, SERVICE_KEY" - After: "Missing environment variables: Requires environment variables for database configuration." 3. Line 264: Removed "DATABASE_URL, credentials" - Before: "⚠️ Requires Supabase test environment setup (DATABASE_URL, credentials)" - After: "⚠️ Requires test environment setup (see environment configuration guide)" 4. Line 466: Genericized credential reference - Before: "✅ Supabase test database credentials" - After: "✅ Test environment credentials configured." **File: docs/test-evidence/issue-618/PR-630-COMPLETION-VALIDATION-ANALYSIS.md** 5. Line 100: Removed "DATABASE_URL, API keys, etc." - Before: "Environment/configuration issues (DATABASE_URL, API keys, etc.)" - After: "Requires environment variables for database and external services" ## Security Impact Prevents exposure of specific environment variable names in public documentation, following CLAUDE.md security best practices: - "❌ NO exponer keys: NUNCA incluir API keys, tokens, passwords en código o docs públicas" - "Security:** Todas las credenciales en env vars. Docs públicas: usar '🔐 Requires environment variables'" ## Validation ✅ All references genericized ✅ No specific env var names in public docs ✅ Configuration guidance maintained Related: #480, PR #647, Review #3372030941 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

… plan Week 1 Day 1-2: Baseline Protection Implementation Updates baseline comparison in completion validator from 179 to 182 failing suites (authoritative baseline as of 2025-10-30). Changes: - scripts/ci/validate-completion.js: Baseline 179→182, date updated - docs/plan/issue-480.md: 4-week systematic test fixing plan - docs/plan/issue-480-assessment.md: TaskAssessor analysis - docs/test-evidence/issue-480/: Baseline documentation + Week 1 evidence Test Status: - Baseline: 182 failing suites (56% failure rate) - Goal Week 1: <150 failing suites - Goal Week 4: <10 failing suites (<3% failure rate) Next: OAuth tests (#638) + Database security (#639) Related: Epic #480 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

Week 1 Day 3-5: OAuth Integration Partial Fix **Problem:** OAuth callback tests failing with 404 errors - Tests expect routes at `/api/auth/:platform/callback` - Routes defined in oauth.js but only registered at `/api/integrations` **Root Cause:** src/routes/oauth.js defines `/:platform/callback` routes with comment indicating they should be at `/api/auth/:platform/callback`, but src/index.js only registered oauthRoutes at `/api/integrations`. **Solution:** Register oauthRoutes at BOTH `/api/auth` (for OAuth callbacks) and `/api/integrations` (for integration management APIs). **Changes:** - src/index.js: Added `app.use('/api/auth', oauthRoutes);` on line 239 **Test Results:** Before: 20 failed, 10 passed (30 total) After: 14 failed, 16 passed (30 total) **Improvement: 6 tests fixed** ✅ **Remaining Issues (14 tests):** - Full connect → callback → status cycle (OAuth flow completion) - Token refresh/disconnect functionality - Mock mode enforcement - User info validation (null user_info objects) - Already connected platform handling **Status:** Partial fix - significant progress but suite still failing **Next:** Address remaining 14 OAuth failures + Database Security tests Related: Epic #480, Week 1 Day 3-5 execution 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

Week 1 Summary Documentation Created comprehensive Week 1 summary documenting all achievements, metrics, lessons learned, and Week 2 strategy. **Key Sections:** - Executive Summary: Foundation established, 6 tests fixed - Deliverables: Baseline protection + OAuth partial fix - Metrics: Test-level vs suite-level analysis - Lessons Learned: Scope estimation, infrastructure dependencies - Week 2 Strategy: Revised plan with realistic goals **Status:** Week 1 PARTIAL - Baseline protection: ✅ COMPLETE (unblocked all PRs) - OAuth routing: ✅ 6/20 tests fixed - OAuth remaining: ⏸️ 14 tests deferred to Week 2 - Database Security: ⏸️ 15 tests deferred to Week 2 **Metrics:** - Failing suites: 182 (unchanged at suite level) - Failing tests: 1,155 (-6 from baseline) - Test pass rate improvement: +0.1% **Next:** Week 2 with focus on completing OAuth suite first, then database mocks, then quick wins on simpler suites. Related: Epic #480, PR #691 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

Fixes 3 CodeRabbit issues in validate-completion.js + adds TestEngineer receipt. **CodeRabbit Fixes:** 1. Line 15: Updated default baseline from 179 to 182 in header doc 2. Line 31: Updated baseline establishment date from 2025-10-23 to 2025-10-30 3. Lines 67-71: Removed fallback regex that could conflate test vs suite failures - Now returns null if suite-level count cannot be determined - Ensures strict suite-level validation only **Receipt Added:** - docs/agents/receipts/691-TestEngineer.md: Week 1 agent work documentation **Why These Fixes Matter:** - Documentation now matches implementation (182 failing suites baseline) - Prevents false positives from mismatched test vs suite failure counts - Ensures validator fails explicitly when output is unparseable Related: Epic #480, PR #691 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

Merged latest main into feat/epic-480-baseline-validator. ## Conflicts Resolved ### docs/nodes/shield.md - ✅ Kept main version (2025-10-28, 86% coverage vs 2025-10-23, 2%) ### docs/system-map.yaml - ✅ Kept main version (2025-10-29, PR #677 coverage integrity corrections) ### scripts/ci/validate-completion.js - ✅ Kept main version with improvements: - TEST_OUTPUT_FILE support for CI optimization - Regression tolerance (±2 suites for flaky tests) - Docs-only PR detection with relaxed validation - Better error handling and debug output - Baseline: 179 failing suites (updated from 182) ### src/index.js - ✅ Kept main version (Issue #638 OAuth fix) - Consolidated OAuth routes under /api/auth - Removed duplicate /api/integrations registration ## Rationale All conflicts resolved by accepting main branch versions as they contain: - More recent timestamps - Better test coverage - Bug fixes (Issue #638) - Performance improvements (TEST_OUTPUT_FILE) - Reliability improvements (flaky test tolerance) 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

coderabbitai · 2025-10-30T14:09:41Z

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the CI validation baseline to 182 failing suites and introduces comprehensive Week 1 documentation for baseline protection implementation, including detailed test evidence, validation results, impact analysis, lessons learned, and a summary report covering completed deliverables and revised strategy.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
CI Validation Baseline Update `scripts/ci/validate-completion.js`	Updated baseline failing-suite count to 182 with associated comments reflecting new validation parameters
Week 1 Baseline Protection Documentation `docs/test-evidence/issue-480/week-1/DAY-1-2-BASELINE-PROTECTION.md`	New documentation detailing Day 1-2 objectives, problem statement, baseline protection solution with JavaScript implementation details, validation results, impact analysis, and lessons learned
Week 1 Summary Report `docs/test-evidence/issue-480/week-1/WEEK-1-SUMMARY.md`	New comprehensive summary covering executive overview, completed deliverables with commit references, test evidence and metrics, lessons learned, revised Week 2 strategy, technical debt tracking, and next actions
Test Engineer Receipt `docs/agents/receipts/691-TestEngineer.md`	Documentation receipt noting baseline update and associated validator output changes

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Minimal code changes (2 lines in validate-completion.js for baseline update)
Primarily homogeneous documentation additions across new files
No functional logic modifications or architectural changes

Possibly related PRs

docs: Documentation sync for PRs #689-672 + CI fixes #690: Modifies the same CI validator script to update baseline failing-suite value and related comments
feat: Implement baseline comparison validator - EPIC #480 Week 1 #647: Adjusts baseline comparison behavior in the same CI validator script with baseline failing-suite count modifications

Suggested labels

documentation, validate-completion

Poem

🐰 Our baselines now stand firm at one-eighty-two,
With test evidence fresh and validation true,
Week One's protection plan documented with care,
Lessons learned and strategies beyond compare! ✨

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

Create PR with unit tests
Post copyable unit tests in a comment
Commit unit tests in branch feature/issue-480-baseline-validator

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1300fed and 60563ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

docs/agents/receipts/691-TestEngineer.md (1 hunks)
docs/test-evidence/issue-480/week-1/DAY-1-2-BASELINE-PROTECTION.md (1 hunks)
docs/test-evidence/issue-480/week-1/WEEK-1-SUMMARY.md (1 hunks)

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

Eibon7 and others added 12 commits October 23, 2025 19:15

Eibon7 closed this Oct 30, 2025

Eibon7 deleted the feature/issue-480-baseline-validator branch October 30, 2025 14:10

Eibon7 mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2025

feat(issue-480): Week 1 Day 1-2 - Baseline Protection for Test Suite Stabilization #693

Merged

12 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

feat(issue-480): Week 1 Day 1-2 - Baseline Protection for Test Suite Stabilization #692

feat(issue-480): Week 1 Day 1-2 - Baseline Protection for Test Suite Stabilization #692

Uh oh!

Eibon7 commented Oct 30, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Review failed

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

feat(issue-480): Week 1 Day 1-2 - Baseline Protection for Test Suite Stabilization #692

feat(issue-480): Week 1 Day 1-2 - Baseline Protection for Test Suite Stabilization #692

Uh oh!

Conversation

Eibon7 commented Oct 30, 2025 • edited by coderabbitai bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary

Changes

Core Changes

Documentation

Baseline Comparison Logic

Test Results

Impact

Week 1 Goals

Day 1-2: Baseline Protection ✅ COMPLETE

Day 3-5: Test Fixes (Next)

Test Plan

Agent Receipts

Related Issues

Files Modified

Summary by CodeRabbit

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Review failed

Walkthrough

Changes

Estimated code review effort

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Poem

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Eibon7 commented Oct 30, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2025 •

edited

Loading