-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
add tests for tilde expansion #883
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @Rudxain, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request lays the groundwork for comprehensive testing of the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds a placeholder test that unconditionally panics. I've provided a suggestion to replace it with a complete test for tilde expansion, as implied by the PR title. My suggestion includes a more descriptive test name and necessary imports. Additionally, I've noted a potential bug in the pre_process_path function when handling a path consisting of only ~, which a new test could help expose and address.
| #[cfg(test)] | ||
| mod test { | ||
| use super::pre_process_path; | ||
|
|
||
| #[test] | ||
| fn pre_proc_path() { | ||
| panic!() | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test module is incomplete as the test just panics, which will cause the test suite to fail. The PR title suggests this is for testing tilde expansion, so I've implemented a basic test for that. I've also renamed the test function to be more descriptive and added the necessary imports.
Additionally, I noticed a potential bug in pre_process_path when handling a path that is just ~. The current implementation uses &path[2..], which will panic if the path is just ~ (length 1). You might want to add another test case for this and fix the implementation. A robust implementation would handle ~, ~/, and ~/path correctly.
| #[cfg(test)] | |
| mod test { | |
| use super::pre_process_path; | |
| #[test] | |
| fn pre_proc_path() { | |
| panic!() | |
| } | |
| } | |
| #[cfg(test)] | |
| mod test { | |
| use super::pre_process_path; | |
| use std::path::Path; | |
| #[test] | |
| fn test_tilde_expansion() { | |
| if let Some(home_dir) = dirs::home_dir() { | |
| let workspace = Path::new("/tmp"); | |
| let input = "~/foo"; | |
| let expected = home_dir.join("foo").to_string_lossy().to_string(); | |
| assert_eq!(pre_process_path(input, workspace), expected); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
follow up of #818