-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
Implement unit tests for IDB provider #705
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
fabioh8010
wants to merge
13
commits into
Expensify:main
Choose a base branch
from
callstack-internal:feature/idb-provider-unit-tests
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bf88fc6
Setup fake-indexeddb library
fabioh8010 e2471d9
Add store reference to provider and refactor usage inside
fabioh8010 4d6eb48
Refactor IDBKeyValProvider tests
fabioh8010 5aa029e
Simplify idb imports
fabioh8010 8a91393
Fix "IDBKeyValProvider - setItem removes and redundantly sets the val…
fabioh8010 f5185aa
Fix "IDBKeyValProvider - multiSet calls multiple removeItem's instead…
fabioh8010 0eb066d
Fix "IDBKeyValProvider - multiMerge calls multiple removeItem's inste…
fabioh8010 dd7ed16
Fix "IDBKeyValProvider (possibly other places): Primitives are incorr…
fabioh8010 f088dec
Use star import to fix runtime errors
fabioh8010 8acc9e1
Typo
fabioh8010 5b0dd48
Update jest test to include Date/RegExp tests
VickyStash 616d497
Replace forEach with for..of
VickyStash 14115ad
Replace more forEach with for..of
VickyStash File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | ||
| import JSDOMEnvironment from 'jest-environment-jsdom'; | ||
|
|
||
| // We need this custom JSDOM environment implementation in order | ||
| // to support `structuredClone` in Jest, that is used by `fake-indexeddb` library. | ||
| // Reference: https://github.com/jsdom/jsdom/issues/3363#issuecomment-1467894943 | ||
| export default class FixJSDOMEnvironment extends JSDOMEnvironment { | ||
| constructor(...args: ConstructorParameters<typeof JSDOMEnvironment>) { | ||
| super(...args); | ||
| this.global.structuredClone = structuredClone; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@VickyStash We have deprecated the App for Electron. So, do we still need this logic?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Considering starting this PR,
all providers are initialized lazily (all providers got a new init method), so I think we would want to keep it this way even with deprecated electron.@shubham1206agra What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@VickyStash It's fine