Refactor PingOneProtectInitializeCallback

[vibhorgoswami]

JIRA Ticket

SDKS-4548

Description

Fix the properties on the callback

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 81.81818% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 47.60%. Comparing base (2b0a1e6) to head (8dfc0c6).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...rc/main/kotlin/com/pingidentity/protect/Protect.kt	50.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop     #153      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      47.66%   47.60%   -0.07%     
+ Complexity      1198     1195       -3     
=============================================
  Files            293      293              
  Lines           8553     8548       -5     
  Branches        1166     1166              
=============================================
- Hits            4077     4069       -8     
- Misses          3958     3960       +2     
- Partials         518      519       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration-tests	28.56% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unit-tests	27.19% <81.81%> (-0.07%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[spetrov]

Looks good to me - the implementation follows the requirement in the ticket.
However, the ticket seems to be a bit misleading, and some of the new requirements appear to be not applicable to the native SDKs, so let's clarify the questions I put in my comments before merging the PR...

[spetrov]

TBH, it is not clear to me if we should include these new 3 "agent" fields - according the a comment in the ticket:

Agent configuration is only applicable to web SDK

[vibhorgoswami]

Should we keep the fields then? If they're not being used in our SDK?

[spetrov]

@vibhorgoswami, it looks like there are many moving parts on the server side. From what I see the callback changes are not finalized... we better hold on with these changes until we get clarity on the requirements...