Skip to content

Conversation

@labkey-susanh
Copy link
Contributor

@labkey-susanh labkey-susanh commented Jan 5, 2026

Rationale

Issue 717 The data class domain kind does not reserve fields from the ExpDataTable, in contrast to the corresponding domain kind and table for samples. This PR fixes that.

Related Pull Requests

Changes

  • Add ExpDataTable.Columns as reserved fields for data classes.

names.add("RunId"); // Issue 50461
names.add("Container");
// GitHub Issue 717
names.addAll(Arrays.stream(ExpDataTable.Column.values()).map(ExpDataTable.Column::name).toList());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should columns from ExpDataClassTable (such as nameexpression, datacount) also be reserved? This is the case for sampleType domain.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. It seems a bit unnecessary but better to have them both doing the same kinds of reservations.

@labkey-susanh labkey-susanh requested a review from XingY January 6, 2026 20:15
@labkey-susanh labkey-susanh merged commit 21e3b4e into develop Jan 7, 2026
13 checks passed
@labkey-susanh labkey-susanh deleted the fb_moreReservations branch January 7, 2026 14:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants