elbepack: aptpkgutils: implement recursive package blacklisting in diet builds #453
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…et builds Implements package blacklisting for diet builds, this allows the user to create a list of packages to exclude from the target. This will recursively avoid installing a package and all its dependencies on the target even if this package comes as a dependency of another package. This must be carefully used as it can create packages with lacking dependencies. Signed-off-by: Thomas Bonnefille <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implements package blacklisting for diet builds, this allows the user to create a list of packages to exclude from the target. This will recursively avoid installing a package and all its dependencies on the target even if this package comes as a dependency of another package.
This must be carefully used as it can create packages with lacking dependencies.
This pull-request conflict with #451 that removes the part of the documentation on target package blacklisting