Skip to content

feat: add type checker for unsigned integers #336

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Darxo wants to merge 2 commits into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: add type checker for unsigned integers #336

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
e785dae
feat: add type checker for unsigned integers
Feb 17, 2024
0fa21c8
refactor: rename function and improve exception feedback
Mar 4, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions msu/utils/type_checkers.nut
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,6 +8,18 @@
::MSU.requireTypeArray("integer", vargv);
}

::MSU.requireUInt <- function( ... )
{
foreach (value in vargv)
{
if (typeof value != "integer" || value < 0)
{
::logError(value + " must have the type: unsigned");
Copy link
Member

@Enduriel Enduriel Feb 27, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd argue unsigned isn't actually a type and therefore the error should be something more like.

value + " must have the type: integer, and be greater than or equal to 0"

Copy link
Member

@LordMidas LordMidas Feb 27, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In that same vein what about the function name? Should it be something like requireUInt?

Copy link
Member

@Enduriel Enduriel Feb 28, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah maybe that's better too

throw ::MSU.Exception.InvalidType(value);
}
}
}

::MSU.requireArray <- function( ... )
{
::MSU.requireTypeArray("array", vargv);
Expand Down