Add try macro without return type adjustment

[Nemo157]

fixes #6

[Nemo157]

@dlight unfortunately try is a keyword so can't be used as a macro name, I've used try_ but do you have any other suggestions?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (8a90f93) 20.83% compared to head (a5b8886) 35.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #8       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   20.83%   35.00%   +14.16%     
===========================================
  Files           1        1               
  Lines          24       20        -4     
===========================================
+ Hits            5        7        +2     
+ Misses         19       13        -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[dlight]

Hey, thank you for that!

Here are some ideas:

• #[try_fn]

• #[r#try] (not sure if this works)

But #[try_] isn't too bad!

[tipsypastels]

#[tries]? Mirrors #[throws]in that they're both indicative verbs.

[Nemo157]

#[try_fn] was also suggested on discord when I asked about it there. I'm partial to that because it has good parallels with #[try_expr] that I'll add to #9 too.