-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
[19.0][IMP] upgrade_analysis: avoid "empty" analysis files #3493
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Hi @legalsylvain, @StefanRijnhart, |
94b6df9 to
dc8fa24
Compare
|
cc: @hbrunn |
pedrobaeza
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review
hbrunn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we have a branch with the output of this changes for comparison?
BTW please merge OCA/OpenUpgrade#5389 so that we can conveniently generate a baseline
Before this patch, sometimes analysis files were created for the modules doesnt' contain any "change". Let's avoid that. Besides other minor fixes, this patch improves the coverage file: No more "No DB layout changes" message on modules that contain the `noupdate_changes.xml` file.
dc8fa24 to
aca06d6
Compare
No..., but nothing should break. We should expect less modules folders (I mean, less "empty" analysis files) and less "No DB layout changes" in the coverage file. |
|
/ocabot merge patch |
|
On my way to merge this fine PR! |
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 558ac71. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Before this patch, sometimes analysis files were created for the modules doesnt' contain any "change". Let's avoid that.
Besides other minor fixes, this patch improves the coverage file: No more "No DB layout changes" message on modules that contain the
noupdate_changes.xmlfile.