docs(erc4626): replace “developer” with “attacker” in inflation defense text

[Fibonacci747]

Align terminology with surrounding context and security semantics. The section discusses an inflation attack; “attacker” is the correct subject. No other occurrences required changes.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 666efe9

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Documentation in the ERC4626 module was updated with wording refinements in the security discussion. Two sentences discussing inflation-attack defense were modified to replace "a developer" with "an attacker" for improved clarity in the security context. The substantive content and technical descriptions remain unchanged, with no alterations to logic or control flow.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and accurately describes the main change: replacing 'developer' with 'attacker' in ERC4626 documentation about inflation defense.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining the rationale for the terminology change based on security semantics and context alignment.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8631702 and 666efe9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/modules/ROOT/pages/erc4626.adoc (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)

• GitHub Check: Redirect rules - solidity-contracts
• GitHub Check: slither
• GitHub Check: halmos
• GitHub Check: tests-upgradeable
• GitHub Check: coverage
• GitHub Check: Header rules - solidity-contracts
• GitHub Check: tests
• GitHub Check: tests-foundry
• GitHub Check: Pages changed - solidity-contracts

🔇 Additional comments (2)

docs/modules/ROOT/pages/erc4626.adoc (2)

46-46: Terminology alignment is correct: "attacker" semantically appropriate for security discussion.

The current text uses "attacker" consistently throughout the inflation-attack section (lines 46, 50, 52), which is correct terminology for a security threat discussion. This aligns with the PR objective to replace imprecise "developer" language with semantically accurate "attacker" language in the context of malicious behavior.

Also applies to: 50-50, 52-52

---

110-110: Grep confirms terminology changes appear complete, but verification of line count requires git diff.

The search found only one occurrence of "developer" on line 6, which refers to developers as end-users who customize the vault—unrelated to the attack terminology being updated. This suggests all instances of "developer" in the attack-prevention context have been successfully replaced with "attacker."

To fully verify whether the AI summary's claim of two modified sentences is accurate, a git diff is needed to see the exact original text and confirm all targeted lines were changed.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[ernestognw]

I think "making it unprofitable for a developer to perform an attack" is less redundant than "making it unprofitable for an attacker to perform an attack"