rout 6

[amazon-q-developer]

Major Framework Modernization and Reorganization (Parts 1-9)

Overview

This comprehensive pull request represents a systematic modernization effort of the Metasploit Framework, primarily focused on migrating from Ruby to Python while reorganizing the codebase for improved maintainability. This is part of a larger 9-part series of changes that spans across multiple framework components.

Key Changes

Language Migration

• Implementing systematic Ruby to Python migration infrastructure
• Creating dedicated legacy directories for existing Ruby code
• Adding Python migration tools and helper scripts
• Setting up new Python-based framework components
• Maintaining backward compatibility during transition

Module Management

• Relocating legacy modules to dedicated directory structures
• Reorganizing exploit, auxiliary, and post modules
• Consolidating related modules by functionality and platform
• Adding new vulnerability scanners and exploit modules
• Enhancing credential gathering and post-exploitation capabilities

Architecture Improvements

• Updating core framework components and libraries
• Enhancing payload handling and module loading
• Improving protocol implementations (SMB, HTTP, RMI, Kerberos)
• Streamlining authentication mechanisms
• Updating database management components

Development Infrastructure

• Adding comprehensive test cases and specifications
• Enhancing documentation organization and formatting
• Updating build configurations and deployment files
• Adding migration-specific documentation and guides
• Implementing new Python framework testing infrastructure

Platform-Specific Updates

• Modifying Windows, Linux, and SCADA system exploit modules
• Updating architecture-specific code (x86, x64, ARM)
• Enhancing platform-specific payload generators and encoders
• Improving cross-platform compatibility

Supporting Components

• Updating SNMP MIB definitions and templates
• Revising wordlists and exploit-specific data files
• Standardizing module documentation formats
• Updating Ruby dependencies and version constraints

Impact

This refactoring effort maintains existing functionality while preparing the framework for future improvements through better organization and a transition to Python. The changes preserve access to legacy code while setting up a more maintainable and modern codebase structure.

[amazon-q-developer]

Resolves #62

[amazon-q-developer]

To provide feedback, I recommend leaving inline comments for best results. Navigate to the Files changed tab and leave comments on the proposed code changes. Choose Start review for each comment, and then choose Request changes, and I'll propose revised changes. If creating PR-level comments, include as much detail as possible in your feedback (for example, file name, class name, line number).

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits.
Credits must be used to enable repository wide code reviews.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🏷️ Required labels (at least one) (2)

• .*

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[mergify]

🧪 CI Insights

Here's what we observed from your CI run for 89ed112.

🟢 All jobs passed!

But CI Insights is watching 👀

[amazon-q-developer]

⏳ I'm generating code changes based on the pipeline. I'll update this pull request when I'm done.

[amazon-q-developer]

🔴 I'm not able to process the pipeline failure.

To provide feedback on how Amazon Q Developer performed with code generation, create an issue in the Amazon Q Developer public repository.

[github-actions]

Thanks for the PR! Copilot will assist with review.

[amazon-q-developer]

✅ I updated this pull request based on the pipeline log.

To provide feedback on how Amazon Q Developer performed with code generation, create an issue in the Amazon Q Developer public repository.

Note: This PR includes changes to Workflow contents under the .github/workflows directory. Since Workflows can contain scripts that are automatically executed upon build, carefully review these changes before committing to avoid unintended effects.

[github-actions]

Thanks for the PR! Copilot will assist with review.

[amazon-q-developer]

✅ I updated this pull request based on the pipeline log.

To provide feedback on how Amazon Q Developer performed with code generation, create an issue in the Amazon Q Developer public repository.

Note: This PR includes changes to Workflow contents under the .github/workflows directory. Since Workflows can contain scripts that are automatically executed upon build, carefully review these changes before committing to avoid unintended effects.

[amazon-q-developer]

⚠️ One or more of the provided pipeline logs are too long. I'm only reviewing the last 80,000 characters of that log(s).

[amazon-q-developer]

⚠️ One or more of the provided pipeline logs are too long. I'm only reviewing the last 80,000 characters of that log(s).

[github-actions]

Thanks for the PR! Copilot will assist with review.

[amazon-q-developer]

🔴 I'm sorry, I can't create any more revisions for this pipeline failure.

To provide feedback on how Amazon Q Developer performed with code generation, create an issue in the Amazon Q Developer public repository.

[github-actions]

Thanks for the PR! Copilot will assist with review.