Ruby2Py

[amazon-q-developer]

Large-Scale Framework Maintenance and Modernization (Parts 1-9)

This is a comprehensive maintenance and modernization effort for the Metasploit Framework, delivered across 9 coordinated pull requests. The changes represent a significant cleanup, reorganization, and documentation improvement initiative across the entire codebase.

Major Changes

1. Module Reorganization and Cleanup

• Mass migration of legacy exploits into dedicated legacy/ directory structure
• Reorganization of modules across Windows, Linux, and Unix platforms
• Updates to auxiliary scanners, post-exploitation modules, and payload modules
• Cleanup and consolidation of redundant or outdated code

2. Documentation Overhaul

• Extensive updates to module documentation files
• New exploitation guides and usage instructions
• Enhanced markdown documentation for features and capabilities
• Updated Wiki pages and integration guides

3. Core Framework Enhancements

• Updates to core libraries in lib/msf/ and lib/rex/
• Improved protocol implementations (SMB, HTTP, LDAP, Kerberos, SNMP)
• Enhanced Meterpreter functionality and extensions
• Refined authentication and session handling mechanisms
• Updates to payload and exploit handlers

4. Infrastructure Improvements

• Enhanced testing infrastructure including Python-based tests
• Updated CI/CD configurations
• Modified build scripts and project configurations
• Kubernetes and Docker-related updates
• Updated Ruby gem dependencies

5. Support Resources

• Updated data files including templates, wordlists, and MIBs
• Modified binary files and shellcode templates
• Revised configuration files and external resources
• Updated test fixtures and supporting infrastructure

Technical Impact

• Maintains backward compatibility while modernizing implementations
• Improves code organization and maintainability
• Enhances documentation coverage and quality
• Streamlines development and testing processes
• Prepares framework for future enhancements

This large-scale update focuses primarily on technical debt reduction, code organization, and documentation improvements rather than adding new features. The changes touch virtually every aspect of the framework while maintaining stability and compatibility.

[amazon-q-developer]

Resolves #64

[amazon-q-developer]

To provide feedback, I recommend leaving inline comments for best results. Navigate to the Files changed tab and leave comments on the proposed code changes. Choose Start review for each comment, and then choose Request changes, and I'll propose revised changes. If creating PR-level comments, include as much detail as possible in your feedback (for example, file name, class name, line number).

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits.
Credits must be used to enable repository wide code reviews.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🏷️ Required labels (at least one) (2)

• .*

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[mergify]

🧪 CI Insights

Here's what we observed from your CI run for 286fb52.

🟢 All jobs passed!

But CI Insights is watching 👀

[github-actions]

Thanks for the PR! Copilot will assist with review.

[amazon-q-developer]

✅ I updated this pull request based on the pipeline log.

To provide feedback on how Amazon Q Developer performed with code generation, create an issue in the Amazon Q Developer public repository.

[amazon-q-developer]

⚠️ One or more of the provided pipeline logs are too long. I'm only reviewing the last 80,000 characters of that log(s).

[amazon-q-developer]

⚠️ One or more of the provided pipeline logs are too long. I'm only reviewing the last 80,000 characters of that log(s).

[github-actions]

Thanks for the PR! Copilot will assist with review.

[amazon-q-developer]

✅ I updated this pull request based on the pipeline log.

To provide feedback on how Amazon Q Developer performed with code generation, create an issue in the Amazon Q Developer public repository.

[amazon-q-developer]

⚠️ One or more of the provided pipeline logs are too long. I'm only reviewing the last 80,000 characters of that log(s).

[amazon-q-developer]

⚠️ One or more of the provided pipeline logs are too long. I'm only reviewing the last 80,000 characters of that log(s).

[amazon-q-developer]

✅ I updated this pull request based on the pipeline log.

To provide feedback on how Amazon Q Developer performed with code generation, create an issue in the Amazon Q Developer public repository.

Note: This PR includes changes to Workflow contents under the .github/workflows directory. Since Workflows can contain scripts that are automatically executed upon build, carefully review these changes before committing to avoid unintended effects.

[amazon-q-developer]

⏳ I'm generating code changes based on the pipeline. I'll update this pull request when I'm done.

[amazon-q-developer]

⚠️ One or more of the provided pipeline logs are too long. I'm only reviewing the last 80,000 characters of that log(s).

[github-actions]

Thanks for the PR! Copilot will assist with review.

[amazon-q-developer]

⚠️ I couldn't create a revision for this pull request. I'm going to try again. This might take some time.

[github-actions]

Thanks for the PR! Copilot will assist with review.

[amazon-q-developer]

🔴 I'm sorry, I can't create any more revisions for this pipeline failure.

To provide feedback on how Amazon Q Developer performed with code generation, create an issue in the Amazon Q Developer public repository.