Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 24, 2018. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@LufoX11
Copy link

@LufoX11 LufoX11 commented Jun 10, 2015

This allows options.skrollrBody to be also a DOM node with the container already set. I had to do this because of JQM and its load structure.

@LufoX11
Copy link
Author

LufoX11 commented Jun 12, 2015

More improvements to be fully compatible with last JQM version.

@Prinzhorn
Copy link
Owner

I agree that a skrollrBody option may be useful. But I will not mix jqm specific code into skrollr.

@LufoX11
Copy link
Author

LufoX11 commented Jun 19, 2015

I think that if you want your plugin to be mobile compatible it should be compatible with popular mobile frameworks. they all (not only jqm) catch and play with touch events like you do, so this change is necessary for all of them. I didn't add any jq/jqm specific platform code but pure js. you can't use it in jqm if you don't make those changes. even more, I improved it fixing other stuff not related to jqm. it's all documented. thanks for your excelent work!

@LufoX11
Copy link
Author

LufoX11 commented Jun 19, 2015

moreover, allowing a custom selector is a more flexible option that's not related to jqm.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants