Sync configurable files from parent repository

[StevenTCramer]

Sync Configurable Files

This PR updates configurable files from the parent repository to maintain consistency.

Source Repository: TimeWarpEngineering/timewarp-architecture
Source Branch: master

Files Updated

Files That Failed to Download

Configuration

This workflow can be customized by:

• Modifying the DEFAULT_FILES environment variable in the workflow
• Using the manual trigger with custom file lists
• Adjusting the cron schedule for different sync frequencies

---

🤖 This PR was created automatically by the sync-configurable-files workflow.

[claude]

Claude finished @StevenTCramer's task —— View job

---

PR Review Complete ✅

Summary: This automated sync PR from the parent repository (TimeWarpEngineering/timewarp-architecture) standardizes configuration and formatting across 100 files. The changes are primarily line ending normalization (CRLF → LF) and enhanced development tooling configuration.

🔍 Review Findings

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

• Excellent: The new .editorconfig implements comprehensive C# formatting rules aligned with repository standards
• Good: Enforces file-scoped namespaces (csharp_style_namespace_declarations = file_scoped:error)
• Good: Prevents var abuse with explicit type preferences
• Good: Implements consistent indentation (2 spaces) and Allman brace style
• Good: Sample code follows established patterns for TimeWarp.State architecture

⚠️ Potential Issues

• Minor: The sync created ~14k line changes, making it difficult to review actual code changes vs. formatting
• Minor: Some duplicate configuration entries in .editorconfig (lines 144-145, 147-148)
• Low Risk: Mass line ending changes could potentially introduce merge conflicts in open branches

🔒 Security Assessment

• ✅ No Security Concerns: All configuration files are standard development tools
• ✅ No Secrets: No credentials, API keys, or sensitive data exposed
• ✅ No Malicious Code: All PowerShell scripts are legitimate build/test automation
• ✅ Safe Dependencies: .config/dotnet-tools.json contains only standard, trusted .NET tools

📊 Performance Considerations

• Neutral: Configuration changes have no runtime performance impact
• Positive: Standardized line endings may improve git performance and reduce diff noise
• Positive: .gitattributes ensures consistent behavior across platforms

🧪 Test Coverage

• No Impact: Changes are configuration-only; existing test suite should remain functional
• Good: CI/CD workflows updated consistently with same changes
• Recommend: Run full test suite to verify no line ending changes broke anything

📋 Detailed Observations

New .gitattributes File

• Enforces LF line endings for all text files
• Properly handles binary files (.dll, .exe, .nupkg)
• Follows modern best practices for cross-platform development

Enhanced .editorconfig

• Comprehensive C# formatting rules with 300+ lines of configuration
• Enforces repository coding standards (2-space indents, Allman braces)
• Includes proper naming conventions and analysis rules
• Minor cleanup needed: duplicate entries should be removed

Build & Workflow Updates

• All PowerShell scripts maintain consistent functionality
• GitHub Actions workflows preserved existing logic
• Tool versions in dotnet-tools.json are current and appropriate

🎯 Recommendations

1. Approve & Merge: This is a legitimate configuration sync that improves code consistency
2. Post-Merge: Run full test suite to verify no formatting changes broke functionality
3. Cleanup: Consider removing duplicate entries in .editorconfig in a follow-up PR
4. Documentation: Update any contributor docs to mention the new formatting requirements

📈 Risk Assessment: LOW

• Changes are configuration-only with no functional code modifications
• All modifications follow repository patterns and standards
• No security vulnerabilities introduced

✅ Recommendation: APPROVE - This PR standardizes the repository configuration and should be merged.

---

Review Checklist:

• Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
• Analyze key configuration changes
• Check for potential security issues
• Review build/workflow changes
• Assess sample code quality
• Evaluate documentation updates
• Provide comprehensive feedback