Skip to content

Conversation

@rinaldiangoogle
Copy link

Both GetTaskPushNotificationConfigRequest and DeleteTaskPushNotificationConfigRequest have a name field that has the same format: tasks/{task_id}/pushNotificationConfigs/{config_id}. Adding here a utility to extract the Task ID and Config ID. Can't output a types.TaskPushNotificationConfig as the PushNotificationConfig requires a url.

Description

Thank you for opening a Pull Request!
Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Follow the CONTRIBUTING Guide.
  • Make your Pull Request title in the https://www.conventionalcommits.org/ specification.
    • Important Prefixes for release-please:
      • fix: which represents bug fixes, and correlates to a SemVer patch.
      • feat: represents a new feature, and correlates to a SemVer minor.
      • feat!:, or fix!:, refactor!:, etc., which represent a breaking change (indicated by the !) and will result in a SemVer major.
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass (Run bash scripts/format.sh from the repository root to format)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

…om request

Both `GetTaskPushNotificationConfigRequest` and `DeleteTaskPushNotificationConfigRequest` have a `name` field that has the same format: `tasks/{task_id}/pushNotificationConfigs/{config_id}`. Adding here a utility to extract the Task ID and Config ID. Can't output a `types.TaskPushNotificationConfig` as the `PushNotificationConfig` requires a url.
@rinaldiangoogle rinaldiangoogle requested a review from a team as a code owner October 27, 2025 15:55
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @rinaldiangoogle, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new utility method within the ProtoUtils class to streamline the extraction of task_id and config_id from specific request objects. By centralizing this parsing logic, it improves code consistency and provides clear error handling for malformed request names, ensuring that task_id and config_id are always correctly retrieved from GetTaskPushNotificationConfigRequest and DeleteTaskPushNotificationConfigRequest instances.

Highlights

  • New Utility Method: Introduced a new class method, task_push_notification_config_params, within ProtoUtils to centralize the extraction of task_id and config_id.
  • Request Object Support: The new utility method is designed to process both GetTaskPushNotificationConfigRequest and DeleteTaskPushNotificationConfigRequest objects.
  • Robust Error Handling: Implemented validation to raise a ServerError with an InvalidParamsError if the name field in the request does not conform to the expected format for extracting IDs.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request introduces a utility method task_push_notification_config_params to extract Task ID and Push Notification Config ID from the name field of GetTaskPushNotificationConfigRequest and DeleteTaskPushNotificationConfigRequest. The method uses a regular expression to match the expected format and raises a ServerError with an InvalidParamsError if the format doesn't match. The code appears to be well-structured and includes error handling.

@holtskinner holtskinner changed the title feat(util): Add util method to extract Task ID and Push Notification Config ID from request feat(grpc): Add util method to extract Task ID and Push Notification Config ID from request Oct 28, 2025
@holtskinner
Copy link
Member

Can you add tests for this method?

`task_push_notification_config_params`
)

@classmethod
def task_push_notification_config_params(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think what would be more useful is a generic function to parse PushNotifiactionConfig's name from a string. Such a function could be used in various contexts beyond these specific requests.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess an option could be to get a string as parameter and fail if not in the tasks/{task_id}/pushNotificationConfigs/{config_id} format. Although, as in the PR description, that would still not be possible to have a more flexible function and output a PushNotifiactionConfig since there the url property is required (unless we change that).
Since we are in the proto_utils I think it is fair to working with these proto requests as parameters.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The behavior would be the similar, your current implementation also fails if the format is incorrect, and you can always move the function to a different utils file. I just think it would be more versatile to have it accept a string value.

I feel like returning the PushNotifiactionConfig would be misleading here. You cannot build it from GetTaskPushNotificationConfigRequest.

@lkawka lkawka assigned rinaldiangoogle and unassigned lkawka Oct 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants