Skip to content

Conversation

@dustin12
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes two problems found in async during load testing:

  1. We should not do any blocking operations under a lock in commit_finished_items. Add items outside the lock.
  2. Timers should be skewed so they don't all fire at once.

Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

Fixes three problems found in load testing:

1) We should not do any blocking operations under a lock in commit_finished_items.  Add items outside the lock.
2) Timers should be skewed so they don't all fire at once.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @dustin12, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses critical performance and stability issues identified during load testing of asynchronous processing within the system. The primary focus is on optimizing resource utilization and preventing contention by ensuring that blocking operations do not occur under locks and by distributing the load of timer-triggered events. These changes collectively aim to enhance the robustness and efficiency of the asynchronous DoFn, particularly under high-load scenarios.

Highlights

  • Non-blocking operations under lock: Refactored the commit_finished_items method to ensure that potentially blocking schedule_item calls are performed outside of critical sections protected by locks, improving concurrency and preventing deadlocks or performance bottlenecks.
  • Timer Skewing: Implemented a mechanism to introduce randomness into timer firing times, preventing all timers from triggering simultaneously. This 'skewing' helps distribute load and avoid 'thundering herd' issues during peak activity.
  • Improved State Coder: Updated the TO_PROCESS state specification to use FastPrimitivesCoder instead of StrUtf8Coder, allowing for more flexible and efficient serialization of primitive types.
  • Reduced Scheduling Sleep Time: Decreased the sleep duration in the schedule_item method from 1 second to 0.01 seconds, making the item scheduling process more responsive and reducing perceived latency.
  • Configurable Timer Frequency: Made the _timer_frequency parameter configurable during the initialization of AsyncWrapper, allowing for more dynamic control over timer behavior.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 23, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 14.28571% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 40.21%. Comparing base (db92a3a) to head (4192812).
⚠️ Report is 13 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
sdks/python/apache_beam/transforms/async_dofn.py 14.28% 12 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #36596       +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage     56.93%   40.21%   -16.72%     
  Complexity     3394     3394               
=============================================
  Files          1222     1222               
  Lines        186787   186915      +128     
  Branches       3545     3545               
=============================================
- Hits         106348    75174    -31174     
- Misses        77067   108369    +31302     
  Partials       3372     3372               
Flag Coverage Δ
python 40.51% <14.28%> (-40.50%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Assigning reviewers:

R: @jrmccluskey for label python.

Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

@dustin12
Copy link
Contributor Author

Run precommit

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant