-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
Veeam: use pre-defined object mapper #10715
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Veeam: use pre-defined object mapper #10715
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.20 #10715 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 16.18% 16.18% -0.01%
+ Complexity 13305 13301 -4
============================================
Files 5657 5657
Lines 498467 498455 -12
Branches 60491 60491
============================================
- Hits 80696 80670 -26
- Misses 408790 408804 +14
Partials 8981 8981
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13054 |
winterhazel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code looks good. I did not test though.
|
code looks good indeed. Is there any way we can test this @winterhazel @weizhouapache ? (or do we settle for the unit tests?) |
DaanHoogland
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
clgtm
@abh1sar @rajujith do you have a running veeam environment with valid license ? |
thanks @abh1sar @blueorangutan test ol8 vmware-70u3 keepEnv |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + vmware-70u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13123)
|
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13413 |
|
moving to 4.20.3 due to inactivity |
|
@weizhouapache anyone we can ask to test this? cc @winterhazel |
@DaanHoogland I should be able to get some time to test this in a month, if this is still pending by then |
Thanks @winterhazel , @weizhouapache and I have no Veeam installation ourselves… I think it’ll be there. |
|
@weizhouapache Please sync the code to the latest 4.20. I'll test this as well. |
9b3b7b1 to
6fe3ca5
Compare
@abh1sar done, thanks |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15674 |
abh1sar
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested with Veeam 12.3. sqlinfo was not returned in the /vmRestorePoints response and the Veeam API Reference also doesn't mention sqlinfo anywhere, so I couldn't reproduce the original issue.
But I tested all backup workflows with Veeam.
- Assign backup offering
- Remove backup offering
- Create backup
- Delete backup
- Restore backup
- Restore and attach volume
- Background sync task
Changes LGTM.
thanks @abh1sar for testing it approves it has no regression, so we are good to go - thanks @DaanHoogland for the merging |
|
Thanks @abh1sar |
Description
This PR fixes #10478 by using a pre-defined xml mapper
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?