win_driver_installer_test: add vioinput import back

[leidwang]

ID:4746

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Updated test infrastructure dependencies.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A single import statement is added to provider/win_driver_installer_test.py. The change imports key_tap_test from provider.vioinput_basic and aliases it as vioinput_test. No modifications to existing logic, control flow, or public entity signatures are present in this change.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

• Unused import concern: The newly added import is documented as unused within the visible code. Review should confirm whether this import is intentional for future use, required by an external consumer, or should be removed.
• Limited scope: Single file modification with straightforward syntactic change.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding back a vioinput import to the win_driver_installer_test file.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e91fe7f and 746caec.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• provider/win_driver_installer_test.py (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧬 Code graph analysis (1)

provider/win_driver_installer_test.py (1)

provider/vioinput_basic.py (1)

• key_tap_test (22-94)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

provider/win_driver_installer_test.py (1)

13-13: Unable to verify through code analysis due to repository access issues. Based on the available context:

Import restoration appears correct but actual usage cannot be verified.

The import statement is syntactically valid and the # noqa: F401 comment explicitly acknowledges it's intentionally unused in the visible code. The PR title "add vioinput import back" indicates this is restoring previously removed functionality.

However, without access to execute verification queries, I cannot confirm:

• Whether the test framework uses dynamic invocation (e.g., via getattr, reflection, or test discovery)
• How vioinput testing is actually triggered
• Whether this import is necessary for the "vioinput" driver listed in the test module

The original review's verification request remains valid and important for confirming this change doesn't introduce dead code or mask underlying issues with the test framework.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

• Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
• Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
• Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
   | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
   Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}