Skip to content

Conversation

@thgreasi
Copy link
Member

@thgreasi thgreasi commented Jan 22, 2025

@thgreasi thgreasi force-pushed the state-patch-v3-factory-build branch from 2e20650 to f5fece9 Compare January 28, 2025 18:35
@thgreasi thgreasi force-pushed the state-patch-v3-factory-build branch from f5fece9 to 0cafe70 Compare March 31, 2025 16:32
@thgreasi thgreasi requested review from cywang117 and pipex March 31, 2025 16:33
@thgreasi thgreasi force-pushed the state-patch-v3-factory-build branch from 0cafe70 to 599a2e3 Compare March 31, 2025 18:25
@thgreasi thgreasi force-pushed the state-patch-v3-factory-build branch from 599a2e3 to 4f514ac Compare April 1, 2025 07:33
: {
apps: {
[applicationUuid]: {
release_uuid: null,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure this would ever happen. The release_uuid property would just be undefined

Copy link
Member Author

@thgreasi thgreasi Apr 1, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I realized, but I wanted to make sure that in case we explicitly pass null in this prop, then it is indeed getting stored, b/c that's what makes sense to do any way.
Effectively I treat the supervisor omitting the release_uuid when it's null, just as an optimization, and make sure that the basic semantics work as well (even though we don't expect it to happen).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it makes sense as a test.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants