Skip to content

Conversation

@InconsolableCellist
Copy link
Collaborator

Explicitly using System.Linq to force .Reverse() on line 67 to resolve, rather than the void that happens in PR building

Explicitly using System.Linq to force .Reverse() on line 67 to resolve,
rather than the `void` that happens in PR building
@InconsolableCellist
Copy link
Collaborator Author

InconsolableCellist commented Dec 4, 2025

Erm, works on my machine. (Quest Pro, Virtual Desktop, UE params w/ Jerry's template)

(This ends up calling Reverse() on the string directly, which implements IEnumerable<char> so char-wise grabbing should work, rather than casting it to an Array and reversing over that; the end result should be the same, taking all the trailing numbers from the boolean param name)

@regzo2 👀

@RantiMess
Copy link
Collaborator

This has been bugging me most of the day

Copy link
Collaborator

@RantiMess RantiMess left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets try it

@RantiMess RantiMess merged commit ef53bde into master Dec 4, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants