💸 Add mention of enterprise support offerings for tiered sponsors. #270
Conversation
|
This vote has been closed by ebullient:
✅ 3 of 3 members of @commonhaus/cf-council have voted (reaction or review, quorum=all).
Additional input (🙏 🥰 🙌): The following votes were not counted (duplicates): |
|
|
||
| - Logo recognition on our website and promotional materials | ||
| - Public acknowledgment through our social media channels | ||
| - If sponsorship is designated to support a specific Commonhaus Project, your logo may also appear on that Project’s website |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just to clarify "support" here means provide some form of commercial support (consulting, patching, releases etc), right ?
Not support in general sense ? Should that be more explicit then?
And side question - and i might just be missing context. Wouldn't commercial support or any one actually be allowed to be on that project website independent of sponsoring via commonhaus ? Or do we now make this a requirement to be listed on project websites?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This particular clause is any kind of support. If they designate some amount of their contribution to be restricted to Quarkus, as an example, then the Quarkus team will have the option to list them as a sponsor on their website, too. (this is an agreement that includes permission to use logo.. )
Re: the side question, the bullets added to silver/gold tier mean exactly that: if you have a commercial support offering, we will only list it on foundation/project websites if your company/organization supports the foundation.
|
|
||
| - Payment is charged annually | ||
| - Modify or cancel anytime through your Open Collective account | ||
| - Select the Commonhaus Foundation or a specific Project when making payment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - Select the Commonhaus Foundation or a specific Project when making payment | |
| - Select the Commonhaus Foundation or a specific Project(s) when making payment |
Not sure if this is the best way to indicate it, but do we need to specify here it can be more than one project? Below there are certainly multiple possible lines. Should we make it explicit in wording?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no. Not with OpenCollective... You choose one. I mean, they could choose more than one, but they create the contribution once per selected place. I removed a, which I think fixes it.
|
vote::result Unanimous CFC vote. Merging. |
I've cleared this with legal counsel.
voting group: @commonhaus/cf-council
Do one of the following: