Skip to content

Conversation

@bmunkholm
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of the changes / Why this is an improvement

New tailored PR template with "Preview" section added.

@bmunkholm bmunkholm requested a review from amotl November 3, 2025 15:37
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Added a new repository pull request template file at .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md; no executable code or public API changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Configuration & Templates
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
New PR template file added containing sections for "About", "Preview" and a checklist; no code or API changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

No logic or executable code; review can focus on wording and formatting of the template.

Poem

🐰 I hopped to a file and left a note,
A tidy template to guide each vote.
Sections aligned, the checklist in sight,
PRs now march forward — tidy and light. 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The PR title 'Add preview section to pull request template' directly and accurately summarizes the main change in the changeset. The pull request adds a new PR template file (.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md) that includes a 'Preview' section, which is precisely what the title conveys. The title is specific, concise, and clearly reflects the primary purpose of the change.
Description check ✅ Passed The PR description states 'New tailored PR template with "Preview" section added,' which directly relates to the changeset. The description accurately reflects that a new PR template has been created with a Preview section, matching the content of the added .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md file. While brief, the description is clearly related to the changes made.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d92dbac and 1b44314.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1)

1-7: Consider enhancing the template with additional guidance.

The template structure is sound, but you may want to add brief instructional text or examples within each section to guide contributors on what information is expected. For instance, the "Preview" section could include a note like "Screenshots, output samples, or other visual previews (if applicable):" to clarify its purpose.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce8a9b1 and d92dbac.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

7-7: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1

(MD007, ul-indent)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Build docs

bmunkholm and others added 2 commits November 3, 2025 19:02
@bmunkholm bmunkholm merged commit 940f077 into main Nov 3, 2025
1 of 3 checks passed
@bmunkholm bmunkholm deleted the bmunkholm-patch-2 branch November 3, 2025 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants