Skip to content

Conversation

@yetanothertw
Copy link
Contributor

@yetanothertw yetanothertw commented Dec 29, 2025

Summary

part of #4117

Replacing all the tags on the page with stack as it applies to all deployments. The tab titles were also wrong, they should be split as UI vs API instructions.

Generative AI disclosure

  1. Did you use a generative AI (GenAI) tool to assist in creating this contribution?
  • Yes
  • No

part of  #4117

Replacing all the tags on the page with stack as it applies to all deployments. The tab titles were also wrong, they should be split as UI vs API instructions.
@yetanothertw yetanothertw self-assigned this Dec 29, 2025
@yetanothertw yetanothertw requested a review from a team as a code owner December 29, 2025 16:48
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 29, 2025

Vale Linting Results

Summary: 2 suggestions found

💡 Suggestions (2)
File Line Rule Message
troubleshoot/elasticsearch/allow-all-index-allocation.md 20 Elastic.Wordiness Consider using 'to' instead of 'In order to'.
troubleshoot/elasticsearch/corruption-troubleshooting.md 21 Elastic.FutureTense 'will report' might be in future tense. Write in the present tense to describe the state of the product as it is now.

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
:::{admonition} Simplify monitoring with AutoOps
:applies_to: { ess:, ece:, eck:, self:, "serverless": "ga" }
:applies_to: { "stack": "ga", "serverless": "ga" }
Copy link
Collaborator

@shainaraskas shainaraskas Dec 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should check with @wajihaparvez before we make this change (I think ultimately the fix might be no tags at all, so it just inherits the page context, given that autoops is now available everywhere)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's a good point! I're removed this change from this PR and opened #4470 instead, so that Wajiha can have a look when she's back online.

@yetanothertw yetanothertw mentioned this pull request Dec 30, 2025
2 tasks
Copy link
Collaborator

@shainaraskas shainaraskas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think add-tier needs a little more work to make the action clear (it was clearer in the old organization), and I added one suggestion for the corruption page


::::::{tab-item} API
In order to get the shards assigned you can add more nodes to your {{es}} cluster and assign the index’s target tier [node role](../../manage-data/lifecycle/index-lifecycle-management/migrate-index-allocation-filters-to-node-roles.md#assign-data-tier) to the new nodes.
To get the shards assigned, you can add more nodes to your {{es}} cluster and assign the index’s target tier [node role](../../manage-data/lifecycle/index-lifecycle-management/migrate-index-allocation-filters-to-node-roles.md#assign-data-tier) to the new nodes.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this step varies between deployment types (the tiers are set differently in ECE / ECH)

self/eck: https://www.elastic.co/docs/deploy-manage/distributed-architecture/clusters-nodes-shards/node-roles#change-node-role / https://www.elastic.co/docs/manage-data/lifecycle/data-tiers#configure-data-tiers-on-premise (I wouldn't use the migration topic currently linked - bad practice to bury evergreen info in migration topics that might be removed)

ECE/ECH matches steps 5-8 that you removed

https://www.elastic.co/docs/manage-data/lifecycle/data-tiers#configure-data-tiers-cloud

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've update the link as per your suggestion and added the steps back in.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this tutorial is no longer really doing anything / it's unclear what the "action" is. the order needs to be:

  • determine the desired tier for an index
  • make sure there's room in the tier

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've fixed this in a new commit, let me know what you think.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we don't want to be in a situation where we only have ECH and self-managed instructions, when the page is supposed to apply to ECH/ECE/ECK/self-managed (self-managed in docs always meaning a fully, manually self-managed cluster). this organization is close, but ECE follows the ECH path and ECK has some extra requirements not documented at this link.

IMO the easiest way to fix this is to break it up into two sections:

step 1: determine target tier
step 2: resize (with pathways for each deployment type)

the info customers need here is similar to this note:
https://github.com/elastic/docs-content/pull/4475/files#diff-2ffc185dff3a45f8a151a9cc15e01e15f80e04641d514bda1a53996490a46e63R16

I also provided some info here: #4465 (comment)

if you prefer, you can take the changes to this file out of this PR and we can handle it separately

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, this makes more sense. Please let me know if this looks better now: https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/docs-content/pull/4465/troubleshoot/elasticsearch/add-tier

Copy link
Collaborator

@shainaraskas shainaraskas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm 🎉

@yetanothertw yetanothertw merged commit a9e421d into main Dec 31, 2025
8 checks passed
@yetanothertw yetanothertw deleted the troubleshooting-tags-fix branch December 31, 2025 17:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants