Skip to content

Conversation

@liuzicheng1987
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @liuzicheng1987, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the project's CMake configuration by expanding the search criteria for the msgpack-c library. By adding an alternative name to the find_package command, the build system becomes more robust in locating this dependency, thereby resolving a known issue and ensuring smoother compilation across different environments.

Highlights

  • CMake Configuration Update: The CMakeLists.txt file has been updated to improve the discovery of the msgpack-c library.
  • Enhanced Package Discovery: The find_package command for msgpack-c now includes msgpackc in its NAMES argument, allowing CMake to locate the library even if it's installed under this alternative name.
  • Issue Resolution: This change directly addresses and fixes issue msgpack library name error for ubuntu (24.04 and earlier) #551, likely related to build failures or difficulties in finding the msgpack-c dependency.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds msgpackc as a possible name for the msgpack-c package in the CMake build script. This improves compatibility with systems where the package is installed under that name. However, the change as-is is incomplete and will likely cause build failures, because the surrounding logic does not account for the different target name (msgpackc) that this package is likely to provide. I've left a comment with a suggestion to make the package finding and linking more robust.

@liuzicheng1987 liuzicheng1987 merged commit 27044f7 into main Dec 6, 2025
292 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants