Skip to content

Conversation

@alxndrsn
Copy link
Contributor

@alxndrsn alxndrsn commented Oct 29, 2025

Alternative to #1651.

What has been done to verify that this works as intended?

CI.

Why is this the best possible solution? Were any other approaches considered?

It feels more idiomatic and less risky than #1651.

How does this change affect users? Describe intentional changes to behavior and behavior that could have accidentally been affected by code changes. In other words, what are the regression risks?

I don't think there's significant risk. getodk/central#1445 is relevant, but not introduced by this PR.

Does this change require updates to the API documentation? If so, please update docs/api.yaml as part of this PR.

No.

Before submitting this PR, please make sure you have:

  • run make test and confirmed all checks still pass OR confirm CircleCI build passes
  • verified that any code from external sources are properly credited in comments or that everything is internally sourced

@alxndrsn alxndrsn force-pushed the formalise-without-symlinks branch from 7767e18 to 8318032 Compare October 29, 2025 06:47
@alxndrsn alxndrsn mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2025
2 tasks
@alxndrsn alxndrsn requested a review from brontolosone October 29, 2025 06:54
@alxndrsn alxndrsn marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2025 06:54
@alxndrsn
Copy link
Contributor Author

alxndrsn commented Nov 5, 2025

#1666 ended up using this approach

@alxndrsn alxndrsn closed this Nov 5, 2025
@alxndrsn alxndrsn deleted the formalise-without-symlinks branch November 5, 2025 06:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant