-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
⚡️ Speed up function validate_entity_types by 70%
#844
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
⚡️ Speed up function validate_entity_types by 70%
#844
Conversation
Here is an optimized version of your program. ### Major inefficiency The code computed `EntityNode.model_fields.keys()` **every call** to the function, but that is invariant and need only be computed once per module. Likewise, it looked up `.keys()` for every entity type model, though these could be checked far more efficiently via set intersection. ### Key performance improvements. - `EntityNode.model_fields.keys()` evaluated **once**, as a set, and reused. - Comparison per entity type uses `set` intersection (O(min(N, M))) instead of repeated linear search. - Only a single scan over each entity type model's fields, not recomputed unnecessarily. The function signature and error handling are unchanged, and all preserved comments are respected. This implementation will be significantly faster for many input types.
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to 2110dbe in 47 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
29lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. graphiti_core/utils/ontology_utils/entity_types_utils.py:31
- Draft comment:
Nice optimization! Caching the set of EntityNode field names and using set intersection improves performance significantly. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold80%None
2. graphiti_core/utils/ontology_utils/entity_types_utils.py:42
- Draft comment:
Consider adding a comment or docstring explaining that _ENTITY_NODE_FIELD_NAMES is a module-level cache. This helps clarify that it won’t update if EntityNode fields change at runtime. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold80%None
3. graphiti_core/utils/ontology_utils/entity_types_utils.py:37
- Draft comment:
Using next(iter(conflict_fields)) to pick the first conflicting field is acceptable, but note that sets are unordered. If the order of error reporting matters, you might want to consider sorting or clarifying this behavior in a comment. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold80%None
4. graphiti_core/utils/ontology_utils/entity_types_utils.py:23
- Draft comment:
Consider adding a docstring for the validate_entity_types function to document its parameters, return value, and exception behavior. This can help future maintainers understand the function's purpose. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold80%None
Workflow ID: wflow_MlQH8c2hqsgh1XvX
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
Here is an optimized version of your program.
📄 70% (0.70x) speedup for
validate_entity_typesingraphiti_core/utils/ontology_utils/entity_types_utils.py⏱️ Runtime :
24.4 microseconds→14.3 microseconds(best of31runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here is an optimized version of your program.
Major inefficiency
The code computed
EntityNode.model_fields.keys()every call to the function, but that is invariant and need only be computed once per module. Likewise, it looked up.keys()for every entity type model, though these could be checked far more efficiently via set intersection.Key performance improvements.
EntityNode.model_fields.keys()evaluated once, as a set, and reused.setintersection (O(min(N, M))) instead of repeated linear search.The function signature and error handling are unchanged, and all preserved comments are respected. This implementation will be significantly faster for many input types.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-validate_entity_types-mdcd3wu9and push.Type of Change
Objective
For new features and performance improvements: Clearly describe the objective and rationale for this change.
Testing
Breaking Changes
If this is a breaking change, describe:
Checklist
make lintpasses)Related Issues
Closes #[issue number]
Important
Optimizes
validate_entity_typesinentity_types_utils.pyfor a 70% speedup by reducing redundant computations and using set operations for field name checks.validate_entity_typesinentity_types_utils.pyfor a 70% speedup.EntityNode.model_fields.keys()once and stores as_ENTITY_NODE_FIELD_NAMES.EntityTypeValidationErrorfor the first conflict found.This description was created by
for 2110dbe. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.