Skip to content

Conversation

@giovanni-guidini
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.


def pow(x, y):
return x**y
return x*y
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: The pow function now performs multiplication (x*y) instead of exponentiation (x**y), leading to incorrect power calculations.
Severity: CRITICAL | Confidence: High

🔍 Detailed Analysis

The pow function at app/calculator.py:21 was changed from performing exponentiation (x**y) to multiplication (x*y). This causes the function to return incorrect results for power calculations. For example, pow(2, 3) will return 6 instead of the expected 8, pow(2, 0) will return 0 instead of 1, and pow(2, -1) will return -2 instead of 0.5. This violates the function's intended behavior as indicated by its name and existing test cases.

💡 Suggested Fix

Revert the change in app/calculator.py:21 to use the exponentiation operator (return x**y) instead of the multiplication operator (return x*y) in the pow function.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.

Location: app/calculator.py#L21

Potential issue: The `pow` function at `app/calculator.py:21` was changed from
performing exponentiation (`x**y`) to multiplication (`x*y`). This causes the function
to return incorrect results for power calculations. For example, `pow(2, 3)` will return
`6` instead of the expected `8`, `pow(2, 0)` will return `0` instead of `1`, and `pow(2,
-1)` will return `-2` instead of `0.5`. This violates the function's intended behavior
as indicated by its name and existing test cases.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.
Reference ID: 3214950

@giovanni-guidini
Copy link
Owner Author

thanks code review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants