Skip to content

Conversation

@Solventerritory
Copy link

fix #1033

@github-actions github-actions bot added status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer component:quickstarts Issues/PR referencing quickstarts folder labels Dec 8, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Solventerritory, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

While the pull request title suggests a grammar fix in 'multi_spectral_remote_sensing.ipynb', the provided changes are actually a significant refactoring of the 'quickstarts/Get_started_LiveAPI.py' script. This refactoring aims to enhance the script's clarity, maintainability, and resource management. The core changes involve renaming the main application class and its associated methods to more accurately describe their roles in handling both audio and video streams. Additionally, robust try...finally blocks have been implemented to guarantee the proper closure of audio and video resources, and the code structure has been improved with new section comments for better organization.

Highlights

  • Discrepancy in PR Title vs. Content: The pull request title indicates a grammar fix in 'multi_spectral_remote_sensing.ipynb', but the actual changes are extensive refactoring in 'quickstarts/Get_started_LiveAPI.py'. This summary focuses on the latter.
  • Class and Method Renaming: The main application class 'AudioLoop' has been renamed to 'AudioVideoLoop', and several related methods (e.g., '_get_frame' to '_capture_frame', 'get_frames' to 'stream_camera_frames') have been renamed for improved clarity and to better reflect their functionality in handling both audio and video.
  • Resource Management Improvements: try...finally blocks have been added to 'listen_audio', 'play_audio', and 'stream_camera_frames' to ensure that audio streams and video capture objects are reliably closed, preventing resource leaks.
  • Code Structure and Readability: New section comments ('# ====================') have been introduced to logically group related methods within the 'AudioVideoLoop' class, enhancing code organization and readability.
  • Exception Handling Refinement: The 'run' method's exception handling for 'ExceptionGroup' has been updated to use 'traceback.print_exc()' and includes a 'finally' block to ensure 'audio_stream' closure, improving robustness.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors the Get_started_LiveAPI.py script to improve its structure, readability, and robustness. The changes include renaming classes and methods for better clarity, adding section comments and docstrings, and ensuring resources are properly closed using try...finally blocks.

The changes are well-executed and significantly improve the code quality. I have one suggestion regarding a redundant finally block that could be removed to further improve the code.

Please note that the pull request title seems to be incorrect, as it mentions a typo fix in multi_spectral_remote_sensing.ipynb, while the actual changes are a refactoring of Get_started_LiveAPI.py. It would be good to update the title to reflect the content of the PR.

@shmishra99 shmishra99 self-assigned this Dec 9, 2025
@shmishra99 shmishra99 added status:awaiting response Awaiting a response from the author and removed status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer labels Dec 9, 2025
@Solventerritory Solventerritory changed the title grammar: fix typo in multi_spectral_remote_sensing.ipynb (#1033) Notebook typo fix + LiveAPI audio/video refactor Dec 9, 2025
@Solventerritory
Copy link
Author

@shmishra99 is there any other changes to be done? Plz inform me I will do so

@Solventerritory
Copy link
Author

@Giom-V @patrickloeber
?

@patrickloeber
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, thanks for the contribution. The referenced typo mentioned in #1033 is already fixed, so I'm trying to understand what's the reason behind this refactoring? Was there an issue with the old code or is it just to improve readability?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

component:quickstarts Issues/PR referencing quickstarts folder status:awaiting response Awaiting a response from the author

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants