Skip to content

Conversation

@KeithLuton
Copy link

Luton Field Model (LFM) - Inference Optimization Kernel
A lightweight, deterministic pre-computation layer designed to optimize RAG pipelines and scientific AI workflows. By replacing probabilistic LLM token generation with O(1)O(1)
mathematical derivation for fundamental constants and scaling laws, LFM achieves:
Zero Hallucination: Enforces 100% dimensional consistency.
Extreme Efficiency: Reduces latency from ~500ms (LLM) to ~1µs (Kernel).
Cost Reduction: Eliminates token costs for complex physics/logic queries.
Status: Production Ready (v1.0.2)
License: Dual (Community/Enterprise)

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@github-actions github-actions bot added the status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer label Dec 12, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @KeithLuton, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces the Luton Field Model (LFM) Kernel, a novel deterministic pre-computation layer designed to optimize Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines and scientific AI workflows. The LFM Kernel replaces probabilistic LLM token generation for fundamental constants and scaling laws with O(1) mathematical derivations, leading to zero hallucination, extreme efficiency with drastically reduced latency, and significant cost reductions by eliminating token usage for complex physics queries.

Highlights

  • Introduction of LFM Kernel: A new lightweight, deterministic pre-computation layer called the Luton Field Model (LFM) Kernel has been added to optimize RAG pipelines and scientific AI workflows.
  • Performance Optimization: The LFM Kernel significantly reduces inference latency for physics queries from approximately 500ms (LLM) to about 1µs, achieving O(1) mathematical derivation for fundamental constants.
  • Zero Hallucination: It ensures 100% dimensional consistency, preventing floating-point errors and hallucinations by replacing probabilistic LLM token generation with exact mathematical derivations.
  • Cost Reduction: By offloading complex physics/logic queries from LLMs to a local CPU-based kernel, it eliminates token costs associated with these computations.
  • Benchmarking and Demo: A benchmark script (benchmark_efficiency.py) and a Jupyter notebook demo (lfm_resonance_demo.ipynb) are included to illustrate the efficiency gains and hallucination prevention capabilities of the LFM Kernel.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces the Luton Field Model (LFM), a deterministic kernel for optimizing scientific AI workflows, along with a benchmark script, a demo notebook, and documentation. The changes aim to improve performance and reduce hallucinations in LLMs for physics-based queries. My review has identified several areas for improvement. There are style guide violations in the Jupyter notebook, such as missing elements and incorrect import placement. The Python code contains potential bugs like a division-by-zero error, use of magic numbers, incorrect type hints, and inconsistencies with a defined dataclass. Most critically, the README file includes a custom dual-license model that appears to conflict with the repository's standard licensing policies and requires immediate attention.

@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
{
"cells": [
{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The repository style guide (line 48) requires a collapsed license cell at the top of notebooks. This notebook is missing the license cell. Please add it.

if not VISUALIZATION_AVAILABLE:
return

labels = ['Latency (s)', 'Cost ($)']
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The labels variable is defined but never used within the plot_graph function. This constitutes dead code and should be removed.

KeithLuton and others added 13 commits December 12, 2025 10:20
Updated version number and license information. Refactored class attributes for universal constants and improved type safety by using a dataclass for interaction results.
Updated the return statement to cleanly return the InteractionResult dataclass.
Updated the return comment to clarify that a Dataclass instance is returned instead of a dictionary, enhancing type safety.
Updated the solve_interaction method to return an InteractionResult class instance instead of a dictionary, ensuring compliance with the dataclass definition.
Explicitly return the InteractionResult instance to resolve type safety warnings.
Added copyright notice and licensing information to benchmark_file.py.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Updated the readme file to improve structure and clarity, added code blocks for better readability, and revised the license section.
Added type-safe return for interaction calculations.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant