Update tool pipx:sqlfluff to v3.5.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
pipx:sqlfluff (changelog)	3.4.2 -> 3.5.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

sqlfluff/sqlfluff (pipx:sqlfluff)

v3.5.0

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 57.84%. Comparing base (3813458) to head (d514460).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8121      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.84%   57.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1167     1167              
  Lines      109264   109264              
  Branches     4976     4976              
==========================================
- Hits        63209    63208       -1     
- Misses      45309    45310       +1     
  Partials      746      746              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.16% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	49.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.46% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	83.78% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Updated (UTC)
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Nov 30, 2025 2:16pm

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 150 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.894 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$32.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-27.478 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-77.899 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-50.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.085 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.692 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.669 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.088 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.623 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.911 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.672 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.141 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.14 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.48 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$39.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$86.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 481 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.556 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$43.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.312 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$46.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$55.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.547 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$41.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.941 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$499 \mathrm{ms} \pm 987 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$99.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 432 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$84.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.423 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$292 \mathrm{ms} \pm 629 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.691 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.627 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.205 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$23.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.397 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 364 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.677 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.671 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.684 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.375 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$30.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.358 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$30.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 328 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.643 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$31.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.720 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$9.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.438 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$58.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.042 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 399 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$64.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$73.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.405 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$81.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 410 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.735 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$87.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.285 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$52.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.910 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$82.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 332 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.629 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$59.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.616 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$70.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 372 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.987 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$71.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.122 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 564 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.349 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 464 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$42.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-60.564 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$604 \mathrm{ms} \pm 972 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph